Monthly Archives: September 2014

White stork modelling

Understanding lifetime tracks and fitness of long distance avian migrants. This is the title of our DFG-funded German-Israeli Project Cooperation and it is also our quest for several years. Within this project, we aim to explore how movement, survival and reproduction reflect an optimal response to the environment. Evidence is drawn from both theoretical and empirical analyses. Migrants like white storks are particularly interesting for studying these questions as they move large distances and may experience different environmental conditions in different parts of the world with more or less strong impacts on their fitness (carry-over effects). Small-scale movement and behavior and their impact on local population dynamics are equally interesting. Latest technologies allow us unprecedented insights into the life of animals. For example, ultra-light GPS tags allow tracking individuals with very high temporal resolution and over several years, and acceleration measurements allow classifying behavior from distinct acceleration signals. These data together with careful monitoring provide the means for better understanding movement phenomena and their consequences for population dynamics and fitness. Juni11 103 Mit_Sender

My main focus within the project are developing behavior-based models for different life-cycle stages (e.g. breeding, migrating, wintering) as well as annual-cycle models that allow studying carry-over effects on individual fitness and population dynamics. Thereby, optimality is an important topic. From evolutionary perspective, fitness-maximizing, optimal behavioral strategies should evolve, determining for example when an individual should start reproducing or start migrating within the annual cycle. On finer temporal and spatial resolution, optimal foraging strategies should evolve which are the focus of our study ‚Individual-based modeling of resource competition to predict density-dependent population dynamics: a case study with white storks‘ (Zurell et al.). Here, we aimed to better understand how density-dependent demographic rates may evolve from home range behavior. To this end, we built an individual-based model for foraging white storks that incorporates both physiology and behavior. We expected that the form of density dependence may differ between different home range behaviors. To our surprise, we also found that it may differ strongly between landscapes with the same degree of fragmentation and the same overall resource availability. This phenomenon is strongly affected by the behavioral trade-offs and by imperfect detection of resources. Thereby, simulated patterns corresponded surprisingly well to empirical patterns although the model was not calibrated. For predicting population or even community dynamics under changing environmental conditions, it seems crucial to better understand these interactive effects of behavior and local environment.

We heartily invite you to play around with the model code (available at http://www.wsl.ch/info/mitarbeitende/zurell/downloads_EN) and adapt it to your needs. As you will see, the model also allows exploring additional aspects of movement ecology, for example studying movement paths or density-dependent home range structures in more detail.

Assassination in the Amazon





Four Ashéninka Indian leaders, renowned for their work against illegal logging in the Amazon, have been murdered near their home in eastern Peru.

Edwin Chota, Jorge Ríos Pérez, Leoncio Quinticima Melendez and Francisco Pinedo were traveling from their community of Saweto on the Peruvian border to attend a meeting with other indigenous leaders in Brazil.

A search party reportedly found the men with fatal gunshot wounds on 1st September.

The widows of the men traveled for three days through the jungle, arriving in the regional city of Pucallpa late Monday night to demand immediate action by the Peruvian authorities to bring the killers to justice.

“The Ashéninka women of Saweto are now taking leadership of the community to continue fighting for territory for our children”, Ergilia Ríos told press.

Peru’s authorities ‘did nothing’

Edwin Chota was a well-known indigenous activist who had dedicated his life to preventing rampant illegal logging from destroying his Amazon home.

Chota had received death threats from loggers in recent years, but the authorities “did nothing” to protect him, according to Amazon Indian organization AIDESEP.

Peru’s Ministry of Culture has said a government team will travel to Saweto to investigate the murders.

In June Brazilian officials warned that uncontacted Indians faced were in grace danger, following a dramatic increase in the number of sightings in the Amazon rainforest near the Peru border, and by the Ashaninka of Simpatia village, who are acclimatised to contact.

José Carlos Meirelles, who monitored this region for the Brazilian government’s Indian Affairs Department FUNAI for over 20 years, said:

“Something serious must have happened. It is not normal for such a large group of uncontacted Indians to approach in this way. This is a completely new and worrying situation and we currently do not know what has caused it.”

Surviving centuries of conflict

The Asháninka have survived centuries of intense conflict since their land was first invaded by the Spanish in the 16th century. One of South America’s largest tribes numbering some 70,000, their homeland covers a vast region, from the Upper Juruá river in Brazil to the watersheds of the Peruvian Andes.

In 1742, the Asháninka defeated the Spanish in a revolt which closed off a large part of the Amazon for a century. But conflict flared up the the late 19th century when Peru conceded vast tracts of rainforest to foreign companies for rubber tapping and coffee plantations, forcing many to flee into Brazil’s Acre state.

Then in the 1980s the Indians were decimated in a violent conflict between ‘Shining Path’ Maoist guerrillas and counter-insurgency forces. In all some 70,000 people are estimated to have died or disappeared during the insurgency.

In a grim reminder of these events, the largest mass grave in Peru was discovered last June in the ancestral land of Asháninka Indians. by a team of government investigators.

The grave contains the remains of around 800 people, the majority believed to be Asháninka and Matsigenka Indians. Bodies from several other mass graves in Asháninka territory are currently being exhumed.

‘Illegal’ hydropower dam still on the official energy plan

Today, Asháninka land is under threat once again – from oil and gas projects, hydroelectric dams, drug trafficking and deforestation.

In 2003 the Asháninka of the Ene River valley in Peru were granted Communal Reserve rights to a portion of their ancestral lands, in the form of Otishi National Park.

But in June 2010 the Brazilian and Peruvian governments signed an energy agreement that allowed Brazilian companies to build a series of six large dams in the Brazilian, Peruvian and Bolivian Amazon.

In 2011, the 2,000 megawatt Pakitzapango dam, proposed for the heart of Peru’s Ene valley, was stopped by a legal action presented by the Central Ashaninka del Rio Ene (CARE). But it’s still listed on the government’s energy plan.

If the dam ever goes ahead it would drown Asháninka villages upstream that are home to an estimated 10,000 people, and open up other areas to logging, cattle ranching, mining and plantations.

Asháninka leader Ruth Buendía was this year presented with the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize for her work with CARE against the Pakitzapango Dam.

 


 

Principal source: Survival International.

 






Gaza’s revenge: Israelis swim in Palestinian shit





Palestinians in Gaza are starting to wake up from the shell-shock of Israel’s 51-day Ramadan Massacre, which left over 2,131 Palestinians killed (of which more than 500 were children), over 10,000 injured (more than half of whom are estimated to be permanently handicapped), and scores of homes and businesses demolished.

Reality is bleaker than ever before. Nothing of the underlying reasons why Gaza exploded into a bloodbath has changed; Israeli and Egyptian closures of Gaza’s borders remain in place.

However, one product is making its way freely across the border into Israel. Actually, this product flows undetected by the almighty Israeli military and rolls right up on to the shores of Tel Aviv.

More terrorist shit

The product is Palestinian shit, or more accurately, to maintain the media bias of the times, Palestinian terrorist shit.

We Palestinians have no love affair with the Israelis relaxing on the shores of Tel Aviv. Many of these Israelis have no problem being high-tech professionals in the morning, throwing on their military uniform and participating in turning Gaza into a living hell on earth in the afternoon, then going for a relaxing swim with the family on the shores of Tel Aviv in the evening.

However, we would advise Israelis, and all tourists to Israel for that matter, to please stop swimming in our shit. This practice is not only unhealthy for you and your children, but it is killing us, literally and figuratively.

In a new policy brief titled ‘Drying Palestine: Israel’s Systemic Water War‘ issued by Al-Shabaka, the Palestinian Policy Network, Muna Dajani writes from Jerusalem of the damage that consecutive Israeli military aggressions have caused to Gaza’s water systems:

“Ninety-five percent of the water that Palestinians in Gaza have been consuming for decades has been proven unfit for human consumption. Electricity shortages that have lasted for almost a decade have limited water treatment capacity and thus the availability of water to households, as well as increased the discharge of untreated wastewater into the sea.

Even before the summer assault on Gaza, 90 million liters of untreated or partially treated wastewater were being dumped and continue to be dumped into the [Mediterranean] sea each day due to insufficient treatment facilities.”

Water war on the West Bank

While the Israeli government continues to maintain a total closure on the Gaza Strip, there is no chance the electricity needed to run the water and wastewater networks will be operational anytime soon.

In her policy brief, Ms. Dajani also depicts the water war being waged in the West Bank. She notes:

“According to the Palestine-based coalition, Emergency Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Palestine (EWASH), between 2009 and 2011, 173 different pieces of water, sanitation or hygiene infrastructure were demolished, including the confiscation of water tankers, which are used as an emergency measure when access to water is prohibited.

“Beyond the Israeli military’s systematic targeting of infrastructure in Area C [62% of the West Bank], residents of the illegal Jewish-only settlements have also been carrying out acts of vandalism and destruction that specifically target Palestinian water sources and frequently taking over natural springs for their own recreational use.

“Settlers can be seen as acting within a clear Israeli policy that sees such targeting of water resources as an acceptable method of warfare.”

Forcing farmers and herders from their land

The damage being done has long-term effects, as Ms. Dajani goes on to write:

“Many [Palestinian] communities depend on basic water sources such as wells, springs and cisterns to meet domestic needs; oftentimes this infrastructure was built decades, if not millennia, earlier and is badly in need of repair.

“Hundreds of such communities in the West Bank suffer from deliberate damage and destruction of their water sources. Rainwater cisterns, wells, irrigation systems, and water networks built in the pre-Roman period have been targets of Israeli military forces.

“The effects of destroying the water infrastructure are not limited to disease, absence of basic life necessities, loss of income, or development opportunities.

“Over the long term, Israel’s targeting of water infrastructure also deeply influences the relationship that Palestinians have with their land. By depriving farmers of water, they drive them off their land. Denying herders access to age-old cisterns cuts off traditional livelihoods and depletes resource-rich villages of jobs, families and traditions.”

Donors must also defend Palestinians’ legal rights

Given the Palestinian economy today is a donor-driven economy, Ms. Dajani is correct in her below statement to point to donors in an attempt to stop this Israeli aggression on our water system.

Until donor funds reverse their political tendency from acquiescence to the Israeli occupation and assume the indigenous populations’ legal rights as part of their intervention mandate, nothing will change.

“Donor intervention in the water field must go from providing temporary solutions to putting active political pressure on Israel so that its military forces cease their strategic destruction of water infrastructure.

“Money could then be invested in long-term development of infrastructure that would politically empower Palestinian communities at the grassroots, ensure access to clean water, and allow for the economic development of both the industrial and agricultural sectors.

“If Palestinians and the donor community could be assured that infrastructure was immune from Israeli attacks, the tides would turn on a policy that has left Palestinians high and dry.”

This seawater may seriously damage your health

The mass majority of Jewish Israelis prefer to just ignore anything Palestinian; to them we are invisible.

Ever since the founding of the state of Israel, the policy has been clear: Uproot the Palestinian population using all means possible, legal and illegal, destroy Palestinian villages in an attempt to erase the crime, and rebrand anything left, like city and street names, in a policy the Israel government has long ago identified as ‘Judaization of the country.

Sadly, this conflict will not end soon. In the meantime, Israelis, please inform your kids not to swallow the seawater.

 


 

Sam Bahour is a Palestinian-American business consultant in Ramallah and serves as a policy adviser to Al-Shabaka, the Palestinian Policy Network. He blogs at ePalestine.com.

The report:Drying Palestine: Israel’s Systemic Water War‘ is published by Al-Shabaka, the Palestinian Policy Network.

This article was originally published on 972mag.com.

 

 






Collectors’ trade threatens ‘Holy Grail’ of the reptile world





An unusual and little-known monitor lizard from Borneo that has captured the interest of reptile collectors is emerging as the latest victim of the global illicit wildlife trade, an investigative report by TRAFFIC warns.

Lanthanotus borneensis or the Earless Monitor Lizard had long remained virtually unknown to the outside world due to its subterranean habits and limited distribution in north-western Borneo.

Unknown, that is, until recently gaining attention from unscrupulous reptile collectors.

Until now, it was only the subject of scientific interest

Earless Monitor Lizards have no external ear opening, a cylindrical lengthened body covered in scaly tubercles, small limbs, a prehensile tail, a forked tongue, and small eyes with the lower eyelid covered by translucent ‘windows’. As such it is placed in its own monospecific family Lanthanotidae.

The small, orange-brown lizard with beaded skin was once primarily of interest to scientists because of its unique adaptations for living below ground, and there were few instances of private ownership reported during the last 30 years.

However, there has been a sudden emergence in the trade of this species over the past two years.

Through its research, TRAFFIC detected international trade in Earless Monitor Lizards that has largely been carried out online from 2013 onwards. Specific instances mentioning the species were documented on forums and social networking sites in Japan, the Ukraine, France, Germany and the Czech Republic.

‘A significant offtake of the animals from the wild’

The study found specimens being offered for sale online across Europe and received intelligence about a significant offtake of the animals from the wild.

This was corroborated by discussions in online forums on the availability of the animals for sale, where there were frequent references to the lizard as being the “Holy Grail” of the reptile collecting world.

“Our research highlights the importance of the Internet and social media in the trafficking of species in high demand by specialist collectors: the reach online traders have is both instant and global”, said Sarah Stoner, Senior Wildlife Crime Analyst at TRAFFIC and co-author of the report.

Keeping an ear to the ground: Monitoring the trade in earless monitor lizards, illustrates the international scope of the trade and the need for international enforcement efforts.

Legally protected – but no restrictions on international trade

The Earless Monitor Lizard is legally protected in its native range countries of Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia and Malaysia. The sudden, growing international interest in the species, however, raises concern given the absence of international trade regulations that would criminalize any such activity.

Currently, this is the only species of monitor lizard not protected from over exploitation under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

“For zoologists and conservationists working in Asia, the Earless Monitor Lizard is truly a mythical creature and something we have read about in the classical scientific literature”, said Dr. Vincent Nijman, Professor of Anthropology at Oxford Brookes University and author of the report.

“The last detailed observations were made on individuals caught in Malaysian Borneo and date from the 1960s. It is very sad indeed that the next time the Earless Monitor Lizard resurfaces after an absence of almost 50 years it is individuals being illegally traded internationally.”

CITES listing desperately needed

TRAFFIC recommends that the Governments of Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia and Malaysia list Earless Monitor Lizards in Appendix III of CITES as an immediate interim action to allow proper monitoring and regulation of trade in this species.

Appendix III of the Convention requires that trade must be conducted only with the appropriate paperwork, which allows countries to track and assess levels of international trade.

The campaign group also recommends the species be eventually listed in Appendix I of CITES, and that enforcement agencies in end-use countries increase their vigilance and efforts to crack down on the availability of these stolen reptiles.

An Appendix I of the Convention listing would mean all commercial international trade in this species would become illegal.

 


 

The report: Keeping an ear to the ground: Monitoring the trade in earless monitor lizards

TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, works to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals is not a threat to the conservation of nature. TRAFFIC is a strategic alliance of IUCN and WWF.

 

 






Collectors’ trade threatens ‘Holy Grail’ of the reptile world





An unusual and little-known monitor lizard from Borneo that has captured the interest of reptile collectors is emerging as the latest victim of the global illicit wildlife trade, an investigative report by TRAFFIC warns.

Lanthanotus borneensis or the Earless Monitor Lizard had long remained virtually unknown to the outside world due to its subterranean habits and limited distribution in north-western Borneo.

Unknown, that is, until recently gaining attention from unscrupulous reptile collectors.

Until now, it was only the subject of scientific interest

Earless Monitor Lizards have no external ear opening, a cylindrical lengthened body covered in scaly tubercles, small limbs, a prehensile tail, a forked tongue, and small eyes with the lower eyelid covered by translucent ‘windows’. As such it is placed in its own monospecific family Lanthanotidae.

The small, orange-brown lizard with beaded skin was once primarily of interest to scientists because of its unique adaptations for living below ground, and there were few instances of private ownership reported during the last 30 years.

However, there has been a sudden emergence in the trade of this species over the past two years.

Through its research, TRAFFIC detected international trade in Earless Monitor Lizards that has largely been carried out online from 2013 onwards. Specific instances mentioning the species were documented on forums and social networking sites in Japan, the Ukraine, France, Germany and the Czech Republic.

‘A significant offtake of the animals from the wild’

The study found specimens being offered for sale online across Europe and received intelligence about a significant offtake of the animals from the wild.

This was corroborated by discussions in online forums on the availability of the animals for sale, where there were frequent references to the lizard as being the “Holy Grail” of the reptile collecting world.

“Our research highlights the importance of the Internet and social media in the trafficking of species in high demand by specialist collectors: the reach online traders have is both instant and global”, said Sarah Stoner, Senior Wildlife Crime Analyst at TRAFFIC and co-author of the report.

Keeping an ear to the ground: Monitoring the trade in earless monitor lizards, illustrates the international scope of the trade and the need for international enforcement efforts.

Legally protected – but no restrictions on international trade

The Earless Monitor Lizard is legally protected in its native range countries of Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia and Malaysia. The sudden, growing international interest in the species, however, raises concern given the absence of international trade regulations that would criminalize any such activity.

Currently, this is the only species of monitor lizard not protected from over exploitation under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

“For zoologists and conservationists working in Asia, the Earless Monitor Lizard is truly a mythical creature and something we have read about in the classical scientific literature”, said Dr. Vincent Nijman, Professor of Anthropology at Oxford Brookes University and author of the report.

“The last detailed observations were made on individuals caught in Malaysian Borneo and date from the 1960s. It is very sad indeed that the next time the Earless Monitor Lizard resurfaces after an absence of almost 50 years it is individuals being illegally traded internationally.”

CITES listing desperately needed

TRAFFIC recommends that the Governments of Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia and Malaysia list Earless Monitor Lizards in Appendix III of CITES as an immediate interim action to allow proper monitoring and regulation of trade in this species.

Appendix III of the Convention requires that trade must be conducted only with the appropriate paperwork, which allows countries to track and assess levels of international trade.

The campaign group also recommends the species be eventually listed in Appendix I of CITES, and that enforcement agencies in end-use countries increase their vigilance and efforts to crack down on the availability of these stolen reptiles.

An Appendix I of the Convention listing would mean all commercial international trade in this species would become illegal.

 


 

The report: Keeping an ear to the ground: Monitoring the trade in earless monitor lizards

TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, works to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals is not a threat to the conservation of nature. TRAFFIC is a strategic alliance of IUCN and WWF.

 

 






Collectors’ trade threatens ‘Holy Grail’ of the reptile world





An unusual and little-known monitor lizard from Borneo that has captured the interest of reptile collectors is emerging as the latest victim of the global illicit wildlife trade, an investigative report by TRAFFIC warns.

Lanthanotus borneensis or the Earless Monitor Lizard had long remained virtually unknown to the outside world due to its subterranean habits and limited distribution in north-western Borneo.

Unknown, that is, until recently gaining attention from unscrupulous reptile collectors.

Until now, it was only the subject of scientific interest

Earless Monitor Lizards have no external ear opening, a cylindrical lengthened body covered in scaly tubercles, small limbs, a prehensile tail, a forked tongue, and small eyes with the lower eyelid covered by translucent ‘windows’. As such it is placed in its own monospecific family Lanthanotidae.

The small, orange-brown lizard with beaded skin was once primarily of interest to scientists because of its unique adaptations for living below ground, and there were few instances of private ownership reported during the last 30 years.

However, there has been a sudden emergence in the trade of this species over the past two years.

Through its research, TRAFFIC detected international trade in Earless Monitor Lizards that has largely been carried out online from 2013 onwards. Specific instances mentioning the species were documented on forums and social networking sites in Japan, the Ukraine, France, Germany and the Czech Republic.

‘A significant offtake of the animals from the wild’

The study found specimens being offered for sale online across Europe and received intelligence about a significant offtake of the animals from the wild.

This was corroborated by discussions in online forums on the availability of the animals for sale, where there were frequent references to the lizard as being the “Holy Grail” of the reptile collecting world.

“Our research highlights the importance of the Internet and social media in the trafficking of species in high demand by specialist collectors: the reach online traders have is both instant and global”, said Sarah Stoner, Senior Wildlife Crime Analyst at TRAFFIC and co-author of the report.

Keeping an ear to the ground: Monitoring the trade in earless monitor lizards, illustrates the international scope of the trade and the need for international enforcement efforts.

Legally protected – but no restrictions on international trade

The Earless Monitor Lizard is legally protected in its native range countries of Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia and Malaysia. The sudden, growing international interest in the species, however, raises concern given the absence of international trade regulations that would criminalize any such activity.

Currently, this is the only species of monitor lizard not protected from over exploitation under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

“For zoologists and conservationists working in Asia, the Earless Monitor Lizard is truly a mythical creature and something we have read about in the classical scientific literature”, said Dr. Vincent Nijman, Professor of Anthropology at Oxford Brookes University and author of the report.

“The last detailed observations were made on individuals caught in Malaysian Borneo and date from the 1960s. It is very sad indeed that the next time the Earless Monitor Lizard resurfaces after an absence of almost 50 years it is individuals being illegally traded internationally.”

CITES listing desperately needed

TRAFFIC recommends that the Governments of Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia and Malaysia list Earless Monitor Lizards in Appendix III of CITES as an immediate interim action to allow proper monitoring and regulation of trade in this species.

Appendix III of the Convention requires that trade must be conducted only with the appropriate paperwork, which allows countries to track and assess levels of international trade.

The campaign group also recommends the species be eventually listed in Appendix I of CITES, and that enforcement agencies in end-use countries increase their vigilance and efforts to crack down on the availability of these stolen reptiles.

An Appendix I of the Convention listing would mean all commercial international trade in this species would become illegal.

 


 

The report: Keeping an ear to the ground: Monitoring the trade in earless monitor lizards

TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, works to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals is not a threat to the conservation of nature. TRAFFIC is a strategic alliance of IUCN and WWF.

 

 






Collectors’ trade threatens ‘Holy Grail’ of the reptile world





An unusual and little-known monitor lizard from Borneo that has captured the interest of reptile collectors is emerging as the latest victim of the global illicit wildlife trade, an investigative report by TRAFFIC warns.

Lanthanotus borneensis or the Earless Monitor Lizard had long remained virtually unknown to the outside world due to its subterranean habits and limited distribution in north-western Borneo.

Unknown, that is, until recently gaining attention from unscrupulous reptile collectors.

Until now, it was only the subject of scientific interest

Earless Monitor Lizards have no external ear opening, a cylindrical lengthened body covered in scaly tubercles, small limbs, a prehensile tail, a forked tongue, and small eyes with the lower eyelid covered by translucent ‘windows’. As such it is placed in its own monospecific family Lanthanotidae.

The small, orange-brown lizard with beaded skin was once primarily of interest to scientists because of its unique adaptations for living below ground, and there were few instances of private ownership reported during the last 30 years.

However, there has been a sudden emergence in the trade of this species over the past two years.

Through its research, TRAFFIC detected international trade in Earless Monitor Lizards that has largely been carried out online from 2013 onwards. Specific instances mentioning the species were documented on forums and social networking sites in Japan, the Ukraine, France, Germany and the Czech Republic.

‘A significant offtake of the animals from the wild’

The study found specimens being offered for sale online across Europe and received intelligence about a significant offtake of the animals from the wild.

This was corroborated by discussions in online forums on the availability of the animals for sale, where there were frequent references to the lizard as being the “Holy Grail” of the reptile collecting world.

“Our research highlights the importance of the Internet and social media in the trafficking of species in high demand by specialist collectors: the reach online traders have is both instant and global”, said Sarah Stoner, Senior Wildlife Crime Analyst at TRAFFIC and co-author of the report.

Keeping an ear to the ground: Monitoring the trade in earless monitor lizards, illustrates the international scope of the trade and the need for international enforcement efforts.

Legally protected – but no restrictions on international trade

The Earless Monitor Lizard is legally protected in its native range countries of Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia and Malaysia. The sudden, growing international interest in the species, however, raises concern given the absence of international trade regulations that would criminalize any such activity.

Currently, this is the only species of monitor lizard not protected from over exploitation under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

“For zoologists and conservationists working in Asia, the Earless Monitor Lizard is truly a mythical creature and something we have read about in the classical scientific literature”, said Dr. Vincent Nijman, Professor of Anthropology at Oxford Brookes University and author of the report.

“The last detailed observations were made on individuals caught in Malaysian Borneo and date from the 1960s. It is very sad indeed that the next time the Earless Monitor Lizard resurfaces after an absence of almost 50 years it is individuals being illegally traded internationally.”

CITES listing desperately needed

TRAFFIC recommends that the Governments of Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia and Malaysia list Earless Monitor Lizards in Appendix III of CITES as an immediate interim action to allow proper monitoring and regulation of trade in this species.

Appendix III of the Convention requires that trade must be conducted only with the appropriate paperwork, which allows countries to track and assess levels of international trade.

The campaign group also recommends the species be eventually listed in Appendix I of CITES, and that enforcement agencies in end-use countries increase their vigilance and efforts to crack down on the availability of these stolen reptiles.

An Appendix I of the Convention listing would mean all commercial international trade in this species would become illegal.

 


 

The report: Keeping an ear to the ground: Monitoring the trade in earless monitor lizards

TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, works to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals is not a threat to the conservation of nature. TRAFFIC is a strategic alliance of IUCN and WWF.

 

 






Wild horses, Hunter Lovins, and the way to a better world





American author, economist, lawyer and environmentalist Hunter Lovins lives on a ranch in Colorado, north of Denver.

Here, she keeps horses which she buys at so-called “killer sales” – where people sell unwanted horses that would otherwise face slaughter. These are then rehabilitated at her ranch and eventually rehomed.

She speaks fondly of life on the ranch, the local community and rural activities such as riding, attending pie baking contests and celebrating the annual upcoming Hay Day.

But truth be told, Lovins spends most of her time on the road, traveling on her one-woman mission to make the world a better place. And her day-to-day reality is far from mowing hay and ‘angling horses’, she complains: “I live on a god damn airplane!”

Lovins has been in sustainability since 1972. She has won numerous awards, such as the European Sustainability Pioneer award and the Right Livelihood Award.

President and Founder of Natural Capitalism Solutions – a non-profit which educates decision makers on the benefits of green business and a regenerative economy. She is also a professor of Sustainable Business and has worked with the UN, governments and businesses in over 30 countries.

It was through working on a project called Green Afghanistan that she ended up with a membership at the prestigious Frontline Club in Paddington, London. And it is here, at Frontline, that I manage to get a piece of her time before she sets off for Heathrow, and her next airplane journey.

Engaging the crowds

Howdy!” she greets me. Lovins is in London for the Green Economy Summit, organised by the Green Economy Coalition. On stage, her style contrasts starkly with the more conventional speakers’ approach to discussing climate change and how to kickstart a green economy, and I dare say she raised some eyebrows.

How many of you went on vacation?” she asks the audience of sustainability professionals from around the world. After a small number of us have raised our hands, she says: “We don’t have time for vacation anymore!”

Her voice is loud and assertive. She goes on to say that the problems we are facing today are “vastly more severe than any of us are acknowledging. And even though we know that, we aren’t living our lives that way.”

If we carry on, business as usual, she says, “it’s going to get really ugly.” She believes the earth is facing collapse in terms of resources, agriculture and population, sometime between now and 2035.

She is a no-nonsense business woman who, at the age of 64, wears a trademark cowboy hat (even in boardrooms), but although she looks tired, she has the eyes and demeanor of a much younger woman.

In 1999 she set off on a journey to promote one of her books, Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution, which she co-authored together with then husband Amory Lovins and Paul Hawken. The book has since sold 100,000 copies and was translated into a dozen languages.

The modern-day economy is driving us toward disaster

Lovins’ natural capitalism is very different from the established concept of capitalism. It is about people, ‘human capital’, and having an economy that works for 100% of humanity.

Put simply, Lovins believes the linear economy of today is depleting our resources and driving us towards financial and ecological disaster: “We dig stuff out of the ground, we put it through various resource-crunching activities and then we throw it away.”

So what is natural capitalism? No doubt capitalism in itself is a charged word. “What we are practicing now is bad capitalism”, says Lovins.

“We are liquidating several forms of capital, human and natural, in order to generate several other forms of capital: manufactured and financial stuff and money. And we define success as more stuff and money, not counting the loss of the human and natural capital.”

People all over the world are unemployed, she says – and that’s a waste of human capital.

Good capitalism equals well-being

The alternative is natural capitalism, or “good capitalism” as Lovins also puts it, combined with a new concept called ‘regenerative capitalism’, which has been developed by the Founder of Capital Institute, John Fullerton.

This regenerative approach, explains Lovins, covers what happens beyond dealing with the immediate threat and will be laid out properly in a soon-to-be-released report.

But overall, she explains, it’s all about sustainability and the enhancement of all forms of capital, to be able to create greater well being: “Wealth defined as money in a bank, digits on a computer screen, is a very pale form of wealth in the old sense of ‘weal’, of well-being.

“And if we and all our friends and neighbours got together, the first thing we’d agree to is: what we really want is to be happy, to be healthy, to live in an environment that sustains us, and can do so indefinitely. That’s the root definition of sustainability, that what we are all doing can go on, indefinitely.”

How can this be achieved? Improving efficiency is the first step, she explains. Then, companies should look at redesigning products using approaches such as ‘circular economy’ (a restorative approach where nothing is wasted) and ‘biomimicry’ (where product design imitates elements of nature).

Lastly, institutions should work to become regenerative of the forms of capital that previously have liquidated human and natural capital. “And there is growing evidence that, again, companies that are taking the lead in this are turning in the better business.”

Lovins says there are more than 50 studies from large companies such as McKinsey, Deloitte, and Harvard Business Review showing that there is a business case for behaving more responsibly to the people and the planet.

Large players in her portfolio

Among companies Lovins has consulted for are carpet giant and sustainability pioneer Interface, Unilever, clothing company Patagonia and US retail giant Walmart (who owns ASDA in the UK).

Walmart, she says, has come a long way in terms of implementing some sustainability measures, but still has a long way to go when it comes to looking after their people and they are stuck in what Lovins calls an “old mental model” of looking at people as a cost, something they demonstrated last year.

“Walmart got its tail in a crack about a year ago coming onto US Thanksgiving. They put out boxes in Walmart stores for employees and shoppers to donate food for employees who don’t make enough money to have a Thanksgiving dinner … What they are saying is: ‘We are not paying a living wage'”.

A new life

Lovins has had a long and successful career, but she wouldn’t be what she is today if she hadn’t had to start over after she was fired in 2002 from the company Rocky Mountain Institute, which she and her ex-husband Amory Lovins founded together in 1982.

She says the company had started losing money after the dotcom bubble in 2000. Lovins and an associate, a businessman she had brought in to help save the company, had gone off to get new business, and when they came back with a new contract, she and her associate were fired.

“We had made the executive director look really bad, and she realised that. So when we were beavering away to get this contract, she’d gone to the board and got us both fired. Now Amory [Lovins] had to be in on it. But I don’t know, because he won’t talk to me. Maybe they said to him: we’re going to fire Hunter and if you get in the way we’ll fire you too, and he didn’t want to start again.”

She, on the other hand, did start a new life: “I lost everything: home, job, community. See entrepreneurial challenge, begin again. So this guy and I looked at each other and said: Wanna go again? And so we created Natural Capitalism Solutions.”

An alternative to the modern economy

Listening to Lovins, it is not entirely clear to me where on the political spectrum her economic ideas fit. This may be because they are neither here, nor there, nor in between, but are more of an alternative way of looking at how humans live on Earth.

What is clear is that she believes in entrepreneurialism, and the value of having people involved in creating and making something that is of value to them.

One of the things that people really want is a sense of meaning in their life. And I think this notion of regenerativeness is one of the better ways of getting that meaning. The constant state of becoming. The celebration of the entrepreneurial in all of us, of creating anew.”

And she is fundamentally a humanist – and her mission os far more to save humanity from itself, than to save the planet.

“George Karlan, the comedian, says: ‘Save the earth? the earth will be fine, it will shake us off like a bad case of fleas.’ And we’ve been through mass extinction events before. 60-90 percent of species go extinct, and the earth goes on.”

She also believes governments have an important role today, and she has a lot to say about subsidies – especially when it comes to the energy market.

The fossil fuel industry is far more heavily subsidised than renewables, she says, and although the final figures are unclear and to be investigated further, she has heard numbers of up to $9 trillion per year in fossil fuel subsidies worldwide. But she says the confirmed figures are high enough:

“The International Energy Agency says $1.9 trillion. You take all the subsidies being given to all forms of renewables and efficiency and any of the countervailing. It’s in the hundreds of thousands, maybe millions if you aggregate it all together. It’s sure not in the billions or trillions. So we have a very unlevelled playing field.”

Where’s your money?

Lovins says people can do a lot themselves and her solutions get right down to the nitty gritty of everyday life: it’s not about worrying whether or not your neighbour recycles, she says.

Instead, it’s about whether or not the big investment flows by business are being put into regenerative investments or degenerative investments, that matters:

“So where’s your money? If you have a retirement plan, is it invested in an adviser who is just investing in the general markets? Or is it with someone who is divesting of ownership and fossil, is investing in the regenerative opportunities? And there are a growing number of funds that are committed to doing this.”

On a smaller scale, she adds, “what is your company doing? Individuals at work can help their company save money, become more profitable, by beginning to move steadily in the direction of becoming a regenerative company.”

One minute she talks about the severity of these catastrophical issues, the next she is positive that change is on the way. I can’t help but wonder if she herself knows whether to feel hope or despair, but I am guessing it’s a bit of both.

But, she says, “we are winning” – and much of what has been achieved so far is all thanks to all the environmental organisations:

“Everything that all of these annoying tree huggers have been doing has built up to this momentum. There is recognition now on the part of the world’s major governments that we are at a crisis point, that the economy as it has been is no longer fit for purpose, and we’re going to start seeing changes. Now, the responsibility shifts to us to be explicit about what kind of a future we want.”

One can’t help but wonder if she practices what she preaches. She is the first to point out that one of her main means of transportation, aeroplanes, are perhaps not the most sustainable.

But how else will she make it to all these events and meetings around the world and proceed to drive change and work towards a better future? At home, however, her ranch is powered by solar power, and her town has a community solar garden.

Why don’t we all drive electric?

And she drives electric, a Nissan Leaf. She says: “I love it. No emissions! I plug it into my solar system and I continue to be gobsmacked: why don’t we all do that? The damn things are on the road now. Why don’t we all drive cars that need no gasoline?”

After our meeting, Lovins is off to wow people somewhere else. For motivating people seems to be what she does best. Finally, I ask her what she would say if she only had one minute to engage the world in taking action to secure a sustainable future. After the briefest pause she says:

“What do you want your future to be? We have all the technologies to solve all the problems facing us. We can build a better world for us, for all of life on the planet.

“Doing that is better business. Let’s engage the business community. Let’s build sensible regulations that enable us to be moving steadily in the direction that we want to be. And let’s reinvent the economy, starting at the community level, but also at an intellectual level.

“The economy we have now is going over a cliff. You know it. You talk to everybody, they know it. It’s going to go over a cliff financially. It’s going to go over a cliff environmentally. So we are on a bus headed for a cliff at 60 miles an hour enjoying the view out the window.

“Guys, first step: slow the bus. Second step: turn the bus around. And then, where do we want the bus to go? We can build a better world. Let’s do it.”

Lovins ideas are compelling, and I leave filled with thoughts, a vague fear of what the future will hold, a reinforced notion that I’m not doing as much as I could, and an eagerness to do more.

And this, it strikes me as I walk down the creaky wooden steps in the Frontline Club, was precisely what she wanted.

 


 

Sophie Morlin-Yron is a freelance journalist based in London, for more of her work see her website. Twitter: @sophiemyron

 






Congo: Africa’s oldest National Park under violent attack by UK oil company





Virunga National Park in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is a world heritage site and contains some 220 critically endangered mountain gorillas – a quarter of the total global population.

Yet the park is grievously threatened by the ambitions of London-listed company Soco International PLC – one of the UK’s 200 largest companies – to drill oil within its boundaries.

Soco and its contractors have made illicit payments, paid off armed rebels, and kindled fear and violence in eastern Congo as they sought access to Africa’s oldest national park for oil exploration.

Through its choice of powerful local collaborators Soco has created an atmosphere of intimidation around its base in Nyakakoma, making it harder for anyone to speak out.

The explosive allegations come in a new report by Global Witness: ‘Drillers in the mist‘: How secret payments and a climate of violence helped UK firm open African national park to oil, based on an undercover investigation by UK film-makers.

Park rangers arrested, stabbed, imprisoned, shot

Activists and park rangers in Nyakakoma have been arrested, imprisoned, and in some cases beaten or stabbed, by soldiers and intelligence agents after criticising or obstructing Soco’s operations. On one occasion, a senior ranger was beaten and imprisoned.

But the dangers run by rangers seeking to protect the park were starkly illustrated by the attempted assassination of Emmanuel de Merode, the Belgian manager of Virunga’s 300 rangers, in April 2014 by unknown gunmen.

The same day as he submitted a critical report on Soco’s activities to a public prosecutor, de Merode was shot twice, in the stomach and in the chest.

Although a number of groups had reason to remove de Merode, the connection with Soco was made more likely by a series of threatening text messages in which activists were told: “Don’t think that if we missed your director [de Merode] that we will also miss you.”

Soco, while denying direct involvement in de Merode’s attempted murder, admits that the threats may have been issued by its supporters.

Soco’s ‘accomplices’ in bribery

One key figure in Soco’s campaigns of bribery and thuggish intimidation is Major Burimbi Feruzi. He is recorded as offering $3,000 – equivalent to a year and a half salary – to a ranger in exchange for his becoming an “accomplice”.

He is also strongly implicated in the deployment of soliders to intimidate opponent’s of Soco. Conglese NGOs have singled out Feruzi, saying: “he has been used by Soco International; his military status has been utilised to silence anyone who has questions about the true impact of the oil project.”

Strong evidence suggests that Soco also employed the services of a Congolese MP – Célestin Vunabandi – who even admits on his linkedIn profile that the company took him on as a consultant. He spoke in favour of Soco at public meetings, in the media, and in meetings with NGOs and regional politicians.

Three sources from North Kivu claimed that Vunabandi was the first person to hold public meetings about plans for oil exploration in Virunga, and that he did not reveal that he was a consultant for Soco.

He is also believed to have facilitated a phoney demonstration in the town of Vitshumbi in support of Soco’s activities. This ‘demonstration’ was attended by Soco agents giving 40 local organisations envelopes full of cash.

Soco’s field Operations Supervisor, Julien Lechenault, acknowledged that Soco had paid for the demonstration.

And when bribery doesn’t work …

When bribery proves insufficent, Soco’s opponents – not just park rangers but also activists, journalists and even fishermen – have been arrested, beaten and received death threats.

A member of a fishermen’s committee in Nyakakoma was arrested on 15 July 2013 by soldiers said to be acting on orders from Major Feruzi – shortly before he was due to speak about the impact of oil production in Western Congo.

In September 2013 an activist with a local human rights group was arrested by local navy officials for allegedly taking photographs of Soco’s camp in Nyakakoma. The activist was arrested again in February 2014 after having asked a question deemed to be critical of Soco at a public meeting.

In another incident, Gaïus Kowene, a freelance journalist for Deutsche Welle, Germany’s international broadcaster, was attacked hours after he broadcast a critical report on Soco in Virunga in October 2013.

Six armed men “dressed in military uniforms” beat him at his home in Goma and stole his laptop before fleeing, according to Congolese NGO Journaliste en Danger.

Soco: ‘We’ll be back!’

Soco carried out six weeks of seismic testing inside the park from April 2014. A deal with WWF, which had initially complained to the OECD about the company’s activities, allowed Soco to complete the tests and give the Congolese government data on Virunga’s oil potential.

Soco has publicly registered its desire that the Congo and UNESCO “come to some kind of accommodation, as has been demonstrated in many other places where they have accommodated things in world heritage sites by redrawing boundaries and by agreeing to certain activities being conducted in certain ways.”

In an agreement announced jointly with the WWF, Soco pledged that after completing seismic testing, it would not “undertake or commission any exploratory or other drilling within Virunga National Park unless UNESCO and the DRC government agree that such activities are not incompatible with its World Heritage status.”

However, it is clear that Soco believes its operations in the park will continue: Soco’s Congo country chief José Sangwa wrote that “disengagement from oil exploration activities in Virunga National Park … is inaccurate.” Soco will process its oil exploration data by mid-2015.

Financing rebels linkled to the Rwandan genocide

In one recorded exchange, Soco International official Julien Lechenault and a British subcontractor admit that the company cooperated with and paid money to Congolese rebels who control much of Soco’s Block 5.

Specific reference is made to the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda, a group linked to the 1994 Rwanda massacre.

The murderous activities of these heavily rebel groups within the park and around its boundaries present one of the greatest long term threats to the park and its wildlife. Over 140 Virunga park rangers have been murdered since 1996, most recently in January 2014.

The danger of violence is also highly damaging to tourism in Virunga. A study by WWF estimates that the park could be the foundation of a $400 million per year tourism industry, bringing huge benefits to the impoverished region. But so long as potential visitors fear attack by armed rebels they will stay away.

Soco’s willingness to accommodate, even finance armed rebel groups linked to the Rwandan genocide therefore bodes ill for the future – not just for Virunga but for the entire region, as it breeds continuing violence, poverty and political instablity.

The outcome of the clash over Virunga will now set the tone for how Congo’s fledgling oil industry develops. Huge areas of forest in Congo’s central basin have already been subdivided into oil blocks.

Soco is eyeing these potential riches and says it has applied for a “large interior block” in Congo. “The whole central basin is virgin territory”, Soco’s Africa head Serge Lescaut has declared. “We must explore it.”

 


 

Gregory McGann is a writer, journalist, researcher and scholar based at Exeter College, Oxford.

The report:Drillers in the mist‘: How secret payments and a climate of violence helped UK firm open African national park to oil.