“What would happen if it collapsed now?”

We were placidly bobbing on New Zealand’s Tasman Lake, staring up at a wall of ice.

“Well, nothing, to be honest. The lake is so deep, we wouldn’t notice the wave out here. On the bank, it’s a different story. If some ice fell in now, we’re possibly in the safest place you could be – from the tsunami that is. Different story if the glacier calves from underneath.”

This was our guide, Steve, a man of reassuring optimism. Nevertheless, the couple in the front of the craft huddled a little closer.

Steve had expertly steered our small rib through the rafts of ice to our current berth, a short distance offshore from the Tasman Glacier – the country’s largest at 600m thick and 27km long. It was like something out of Game of Thrones, sheer cliffs of ice rose from the murky deep to tower above our heads.

And it was blue. I had seen ice before back home, in the frozen puddles and tractor ruts that riddle Wiltshire’s countryside, but nothing came close to matching this shade of azure.

“It’s to do with the lack of air bubbles.” Steve explained, “The snowfall crushes the underlying ice, squeezing out the air. This purer ice only reflects blue wavelengths.”

Steve turned our attention to a nearby iceberg that had broken off from the glacier.

Up close, the size of these floating peaks was truly intimidating. It was inconceivable to imagine the other 90% concealed underwater, and daunting to contemplate the danger this hidden portion posed. Submerged ice fans out from the iceberg in a shallow shelf below the waterline, and the shelf’s greater buoyancy means it yearns to break free from the main core and rise to the surface. When it does, chaos ensues.

“If the surfacing slabs don’t get us, the main iceberg will – pretty unstable after such a trauma, like as not she’ll flip over. And this ice is a lot denser than the stuff in your fridge, we’d have no chance! But still, a collapse from the main glacier is a whole different situation.”

Big collapses, or ‘calvings’, occur when the unstable end of the glacier breaks off into the lake, and with glaciers such as the Tasman these happen about once every Summer.

“Though this season we’ve had two already, which is strange.” Steve broke off and frowned at the glacier.

So when was the last calving?

“Oh, two nights ago in fact!” Steve recalled.

A silence descended on our vessel.

“But don’t worry,” he added quickly, “calvings don’t usually occur so soon after one another.” tactfully defusing the tension in the boat, if not the glacier. For the Tasman is fast disappearing. In the 1990s the annual retreat was 180m. Today, the ice melts at a shocking 800m per year.

“It’s a shame,” mused Steve, gazing up at the root of the glacier high up in the mountains.  He glanced at some kids in the back of the boat.

 “Sadly, when you all come back here in 50 years, we’ll be doing this tour by helicopter.”

This Author

Ecologist ‘New Voices’ Travel blogger Robbie Trevelyan has just graduated from Bristol University with an MSc in Geology with a special emphasis on environmental issues such a climate change and anthropogenic forcing. He is planning a career as an environmental journalist.

“What would happen if it collapsed now?”

We were placidly bobbing on New Zealand’s Tasman Lake, staring up at a wall of ice.

“Well, nothing, to be honest. The lake is so deep, we wouldn’t notice the wave out here. On the bank, it’s a different story. If some ice fell in now, we’re possibly in the safest place you could be – from the tsunami that is. Different story if the glacier calves from underneath.”

This was our guide, Steve, a man of reassuring optimism. Nevertheless, the couple in the front of the craft huddled a little closer.

Steve had expertly steered our small rib through the rafts of ice to our current berth, a short distance offshore from the Tasman Glacier – the country’s largest at 600m thick and 27km long. It was like something out of Game of Thrones, sheer cliffs of ice rose from the murky deep to tower above our heads.

And it was blue. I had seen ice before back home, in the frozen puddles and tractor ruts that riddle Wiltshire’s countryside, but nothing came close to matching this shade of azure.

“It’s to do with the lack of air bubbles.” Steve explained, “The snowfall crushes the underlying ice, squeezing out the air. This purer ice only reflects blue wavelengths.”

Steve turned our attention to a nearby iceberg that had broken off from the glacier.

Up close, the size of these floating peaks was truly intimidating. It was inconceivable to imagine the other 90% concealed underwater, and daunting to contemplate the danger this hidden portion posed. Submerged ice fans out from the iceberg in a shallow shelf below the waterline, and the shelf’s greater buoyancy means it yearns to break free from the main core and rise to the surface. When it does, chaos ensues.

“If the surfacing slabs don’t get us, the main iceberg will – pretty unstable after such a trauma, like as not she’ll flip over. And this ice is a lot denser than the stuff in your fridge, we’d have no chance! But still, a collapse from the main glacier is a whole different situation.”

Big collapses, or ‘calvings’, occur when the unstable end of the glacier breaks off into the lake, and with glaciers such as the Tasman these happen about once every Summer.

“Though this season we’ve had two already, which is strange.” Steve broke off and frowned at the glacier.

So when was the last calving?

“Oh, two nights ago in fact!” Steve recalled.

A silence descended on our vessel.

“But don’t worry,” he added quickly, “calvings don’t usually occur so soon after one another.” tactfully defusing the tension in the boat, if not the glacier. For the Tasman is fast disappearing. In the 1990s the annual retreat was 180m. Today, the ice melts at a shocking 800m per year.

“It’s a shame,” mused Steve, gazing up at the root of the glacier high up in the mountains.  He glanced at some kids in the back of the boat.

 “Sadly, when you all come back here in 50 years, we’ll be doing this tour by helicopter.”

This Author

Ecologist ‘New Voices’ Travel blogger Robbie Trevelyan has just graduated from Bristol University with an MSc in Geology with a special emphasis on environmental issues such a climate change and anthropogenic forcing. He is planning a career as an environmental journalist.

“What would happen if it collapsed now?”

We were placidly bobbing on New Zealand’s Tasman Lake, staring up at a wall of ice.

“Well, nothing, to be honest. The lake is so deep, we wouldn’t notice the wave out here. On the bank, it’s a different story. If some ice fell in now, we’re possibly in the safest place you could be – from the tsunami that is. Different story if the glacier calves from underneath.”

This was our guide, Steve, a man of reassuring optimism. Nevertheless, the couple in the front of the craft huddled a little closer.

Steve had expertly steered our small rib through the rafts of ice to our current berth, a short distance offshore from the Tasman Glacier – the country’s largest at 600m thick and 27km long. It was like something out of Game of Thrones, sheer cliffs of ice rose from the murky deep to tower above our heads.

And it was blue. I had seen ice before back home, in the frozen puddles and tractor ruts that riddle Wiltshire’s countryside, but nothing came close to matching this shade of azure.

“It’s to do with the lack of air bubbles.” Steve explained, “The snowfall crushes the underlying ice, squeezing out the air. This purer ice only reflects blue wavelengths.”

Steve turned our attention to a nearby iceberg that had broken off from the glacier.

Up close, the size of these floating peaks was truly intimidating. It was inconceivable to imagine the other 90% concealed underwater, and daunting to contemplate the danger this hidden portion posed. Submerged ice fans out from the iceberg in a shallow shelf below the waterline, and the shelf’s greater buoyancy means it yearns to break free from the main core and rise to the surface. When it does, chaos ensues.

“If the surfacing slabs don’t get us, the main iceberg will – pretty unstable after such a trauma, like as not she’ll flip over. And this ice is a lot denser than the stuff in your fridge, we’d have no chance! But still, a collapse from the main glacier is a whole different situation.”

Big collapses, or ‘calvings’, occur when the unstable end of the glacier breaks off into the lake, and with glaciers such as the Tasman these happen about once every Summer.

“Though this season we’ve had two already, which is strange.” Steve broke off and frowned at the glacier.

So when was the last calving?

“Oh, two nights ago in fact!” Steve recalled.

A silence descended on our vessel.

“But don’t worry,” he added quickly, “calvings don’t usually occur so soon after one another.” tactfully defusing the tension in the boat, if not the glacier. For the Tasman is fast disappearing. In the 1990s the annual retreat was 180m. Today, the ice melts at a shocking 800m per year.

“It’s a shame,” mused Steve, gazing up at the root of the glacier high up in the mountains.  He glanced at some kids in the back of the boat.

 “Sadly, when you all come back here in 50 years, we’ll be doing this tour by helicopter.”

This Author

Ecologist ‘New Voices’ Travel blogger Robbie Trevelyan has just graduated from Bristol University with an MSc in Geology with a special emphasis on environmental issues such a climate change and anthropogenic forcing. He is planning a career as an environmental journalist.

“Whoever you are, no matter how lonely, the world offers itself to your imagination, calls you like the wild geese, harsh and exciting – over and over announcing your place in the family of things.” The poet Mary Oliver reminds us the choice to come home into the community of life is ours, every day anew.

Those of us alive today are the cast for an epic of civilizational transformation. Something the environmental activist and author, Joanna Macy, describes as “The Great Turning.”

As this story unfolds we will see humanity collaborating in the conscious re-design of its collective impact on Earth. This is already happening and this much-needed Re-Generation is on the rise. The biophysical reality of a planet in crisis dictates our design brief: We have to shift from the current degenerative, exploitative and competitive practices to regenerative, productive and collaborative practices.

If we want to co-create a future worth living, all of humanity will have to learn to collaborate. We need to come together in all our wonderful diversity as one Re-Generation facing our common challenge: to re-design our human presence on Earth in accordance with our place in the family of things.

Designing for sustainability and regeneration

Over a seven-year period, starting in 1998, educators and practitioners from many of the leading experimental communities and ecovillages within the Global Ecovillage Network have co-created a curriculum for ‘Ecovillage Design Education’ (EDE), which was launched as a contribution to the UN Decade for Education for Sustainable Development in 2005.

After finishing my PhD in Design for Sustainability, I joined Gaia Education’s first training of trainers at the Findhorn Foundation ecovillage in 2006.  Over the last 10 years, I have taught on EDE courses in Scotland, Spain and Thailand, and co-authored the curriculum of their online programmes. Apart from Schumacher College, where I gained a Masters in Holistic Science in 2002, I don’t know of any comparable organization providing equally transformative eduction for sustainability.

Since 2005, Gaia Education has successfully trained thousands of committed global-local change makers in 41 countries on 6 continents, moving beyond ecovillage design to supporting sustainable community development at village, town, city and regional scale.

After the Sustainable Development Goals were ratified by the United Nations in September last year, Gaia Education was invited to join the ‘UNESCO Global Action Programme‘ to support the on-the-ground implementation of the SDGs through its diverse educational activities.

Run by a small, decentralized global team, the charity offers design-centered education and trainings – both face-to-face and online. Its diverse programs are aimed at people of all ages who share the common wish to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem. While most courses are vocational or life-long-learning offers, some also carry academic accreditation through partner institutions.

The sustainable design framework behind Gaia Education’s broad range of programs is a curriculum organized into the four dimensions of sustainable community development. These are: social design, economic design, ecological design and worldview.

The 4-D Framework for Integrative Whole Systems Design for Sustainability

Rather than sticking with the conventional ‘three-legged-stool’ framework of sustainability, Gaia Education has always highlighted the importance of culture, worldview, values and spirituality as a critical fourth dimension of sustainability.

Change in worldviews and culture change go hand in hand. They are the drivers of behaviour change. The why affects the how and what we design. As our worldview changes, so do our intentions and our real and perceived needs.

A holistic, participatory and ecologically informed living systems view of life explores the why of sustainability and regeneration providing a basis for reframing humanity’s guiding story from one of separation to one of interbeing. Such a perspective allows us to synergistically integrate the social, economic and ecological aspects of the transition ahead.

Social Design

During the social dimension participants explore how to create a shared vision for collective projects and improve their communications skills. Inclusive decision making, creative conflict resolution or mediation, and effective work in social networks form part of this dimension, just as much as constructive ways to celebrate diversity and work creatively with differences in perspective and worldview.

Participants learn to reframe biocultural diversity as a source of resilience and the collective intelligence necessary for transformative innovation. Multi-stakeholder process facilitation is a vital for effective change agents.

Economic Design

The economic dimension highlights the structural dysfunction of our current economic and monetary systems and explores diverse strategies for creating and strengthening vibrant local economies. Learning about BALLE, nef, ISEC, the New Economics Coalition and the Solidarity Economy helps participants realize that we already have viable alternatives to neoclassical economic globalization.

By introducing methods and principles for creating community currencies and exchange systems and new types of economic success indicators, and by reviewing the legal forms, business models and financing mechanisms that can support the creation of social and regenerative enterprises, the courses enable participants to become active catalysts in the transition to vibrant regional economies based on ecological and social values and supported by global collaboration and solidarity.

Ecological Design

The competencies that are fostered during the ecological design dimension include how to ‘carbon footprint’ a project and design for carbon-neutrality or even carbon sequestration. Regenerative water management that integrates with the unique conditions of place, and a basic introduction to a broad range of decentralized renewable energy sources and their most appropriate application, are equally a part of the curriculum as ecological building methods and sustainable materials that are elegantly adapted to bioregional resource availability.

An introduction to the importance of local food economies, key methodologies of regenerative agriculture, permaculture design principles, and the cradle-to-cradle framework, are part of enabling graduates to facilitate ecological design conversations in support of increased regional food and seed sovereignty, local circular bio-economies and a shift towards increase local production for local consumption.

A New Worldview

This dimension explores the why of creating sustainable and regenerative cultures. Participants are invited to contemplate the role of spiritual practices like meditation, pilgrimage, prayer or solo-time in nature in creating deeper socio-cultural and ecological ties with the place we inhabit and the communities we participate in. Studying integral theory, Aldo Leopold’s ‘land ethics’, the importance of a (bioregional) ‘sense of place’ and ‘sense of belonging’ lead participants to question and become aware of their own perspectives and those of others.

Methods for collective future state visioning and backcasting are introduced as potential catalysts for collective action and local collaboration. New and ancient (Indigenous) frameworks of meaning and the role of rituals and rites of passage, plus healthy lifestyles, socially-engaged spirituality and evolutionary activism are all offered as potentially useful methods and perspectives that can help individuals and communities to become more effective agents of positive change.

Glocal education: local and regional capacity building through global collaboration and exchange

From social entrepreneurs to design and planning professionals, intentional community initiatives, educators, social workers, cooperativists, people in a phase of reorientation or students on a gap year, many of have agreed that Gaia Education’s programmes had a transformative impact on their lives. Educating for the Re-Generation is about transcending specialization and helping everyone to appreciate that we all have a part to play in the transition ahead. What participants learn from each other and through collaboration has equal importance to the curriculum itself.

Including members of Transition Town groups in the Global North or in the mega-cities of Brazil, community leaders in illiterate rubber tapper communities in the middle of the Amazon, tribal villagers in Senegal, the Congo, Bangladesh, India or Thailand, or disadvantaged youth in favelas and African migrants on Sicily, school kids in Estonia, business leaders, impact investors, academics, and policy makers, the more than 7,000 current graduates of the Gaia Education programmes could not be more diverse.

Building on the ground capacity for community-led action and supporting effective change agents who help to drive local and regional transformation towards thriving communities and vibrant local economies is the goal of all Gaia Education programmes.

Local action is supported and inspired by global goals and international collaboration. There is a growing network of both trainers and graduates who have all learned to celebrate differences in worldview, skills, and perspective as a source of collective intelligence and as a bio-cultural resource rather than obstacles to overcome.

Gaia Education collaborates with more than 30 host sites across North and Latin America, many of them in Brazil where progammes have now been taught in 15 different communities and cities. In Europe there are 20 communities and education centres hosting programmes in 10 different countries from Northern Finland to Southern Italy. In Africa and the Middle East, Gaia Education works with local organizers in South Africa, the Congo, the Gambia, Senegal, Israel, Palestine and Turkey. In Asia and Oceania programmes are offered in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Thailand, the Philippines, Japan, China and Australia.

Adapting to the needs of learners everywhere

Supporting sustainability and regeneration globally, regionally and locally cannot happen through a one-size-fits all approach. It needs to be supported by networks of collaboration that span the different scales of design. To offer a variety of entry points into a learning journey designed to support a broad spectrum of participants with a breathtaking diversity of ethnic, educational, and professional backgrounds, Gaia Education has evolved a variety of different programmes and modalities to support learning.

Example one: Project-based leaning in Bangladesh, India, Senegal, and Sicily

Working directly with disadvantaged people and communities on the ground has been an aim for Gaia Education for many years. The Project-Based-Learning approach enables participants to acquire tools, methods and design skills that support them in implementing practical solutions to some of their most pressing issues – with a direct and beneficial impact on their lives.

With support from the Scottish government and in collaboration with the Bangladesh Association for Sustainable Development (BASD), Gaia Education has created a series of capacity-building workshops that enable in women (in particular) to flood-proof their houses, create highly productive organic vegetable gardens and establish aquaculture systems to produce good quality local protein.

In Orissa, India, Gaia Education has led a Scottish government-funded collaboration with the local NGO THREAD and a local women’s association to promote ‘climate smart agriculture’ and strengthen local food security by building capacity to design and by implementing productive agro-ecological food systems that blend traditional techniques with permaculture.

Senegal has adopted ecovillage development as a national sustainability and rural development strategy in close collaboration with the Global Ecovillage Network. In the Podor Region of Northern Senegal, four villages have been supported by Gaia Education and local organizations – funded by UK Aid – to improve food security, income generation and environmental sustainability.

By learning on projects that implement agro-forestry practices combining traditional and modern land-use systems, villagers increase their competencies with regard to permaculture practices, food processing and trading in the local food economy. Thus these programmes have a direct beneficial impact on the quality of life of people living in these communities.

One of the design principles of Gaia Education courses is about maximizing the ‘edge-effect’ that works creatively with the diversity generated as two or more ecosystems, cultures, or disciplines meet. The more diverse the system the more resilient (and potentially innovative) its transformative responses to environmental, social or economic change. The short video (link below) explores this approach and introduces a variety of the project-based learning programmes around the world.

VIDEO on Maximizing the Edges: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeNUqVFuCGo

Example two: Grass-roots capacity building course in sustainable community (ecovillage) design

Gaia Education’s most established programme was originally called Ecovillage Design Education but in many countries is now simply referred to as ‘the Gaia course’.  This face-to-face programme has been taught in a variety of formats from four week long residential trainings to a series of weekend courses over a few months.

The 125-contact-hour programme follows the four dimensions of sustainable community design explored above and gives students a lived experience of co-creating whole systems design projects together. The basic syllabus for this course has been translated into eight languages and is available for free download in English, Danish, French, Spanish, Portuguese, German, Japanese, Finnish and Chinese.

Four books called The Four Keys – one for each of the dimensions of the curriculum – were published as an official contribution to the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (UNDESD, 2004-15). These collections of short essays by a wide range of practitioners and activists from around the world offer inspiration and advice on how to effectively support sustainable community and enterprise development.

A participant of an EDE course in Denmark commented afterwards: “I didn’t know a lot about sustainability before coming here. […] now, I look at sustainable community with new eyes and I totally embrace it all”, and a graduate from a USA based course wrote: “I finally crossed the threshold and will lead a life that serves our planet.”

The short video (link below) describes the success of the EDE programmes around the world.

EDE Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrZzBFUXnFY

Example three: UNESCO endorsed on-line course in Design for Sustainability

 Since 2009 the Gaia Education has been offering a very content- and information-rich online course – called Gaia Education Design for Sustainability (GEDS) – to enable people to gain an even deeper knowledge base in the thematic areas of the four dimensions. Subsequently they are challenged to integrate their new skills and knowledge of each dimension within a collaborative design studio project focused on a real locality and real projects – often championed by one of the participants who is aiming to implement the project (see link for a wonderful diversity of case-studies).

The course is taught entirely on-line using a collaboration platform that enables students from all round the world to form an effective learning community, supported by skilled and experienced tutors. With a minimum of 450 hours of study and design time, this course requires a significant commitment. From 2016 onwards it is also offered as part of Gaia Education’s professional pathway and training of trainers.

The GEDS is offered in Spanish through the Open University of Catalunya with varying levels of academic accreditation, including the option of taking it as the first year of a 2-year online Masters.  The English version is currently offered directly through Gaia Education with an option of gaining academic credits through Goddard College in the US; and this year, a Portuguese version has been added.

Gaia Education’s Growing Edge

Among the new programmes that are currently being piloted or in development are:

–   the Training of Trainers aimed at creating skilled multipliers who can help Gaia Education to reach more people;

–   a series of programmes adapting the curriculum for children and youth already underway in Estonia, India, and Brazil;

–   a new partnership with the UN and Strathclyde University offering a short on-line module as an introduction to decentralized renewable energy systems at the community scale;

–   a new project-based-learning program focused practical skills in regenerative organic agriculture and local food systems offered to migrants and unemployed youth in Sicily;

–   a new introductory course, and a month-long online course in partnership with Ubiquity University; and

–   the development of an ambitious regionally focused 9-month blended-learning programme to foster social and ecological entrepreneurship and create employment within a Bioregional Design Education (BDE) framework – to be piloted in Scotland, Spain, Italy and Israel in 2017.

My own path of learning has greatly benefited from the supportive community provided by both colleagues and students on Gaia Education programmes. The track record created since the official launch in 2005 is impressive. I am committed to making more people aware of Gaia Education so more people can benefit from their programmes and become skilled agents of positive and so urgently needed change.

I know of few organization that offer equally effective education for the Re-Generation, enabling people of all walks of life on six continents to help in the re-design of their communities. In doing so we really are beginning to redesign our presence on Earth in accordance with humanity’s place in the family of things.

This Author

Daniel Christian Wahl is an educator, activist and consultant, specialized in whole systems design and transformative innovation for regenerative cultures. A member of the International Futures Forum, a fellow of the RSA, and a Findhorn Foundation fellow, Daniel currently works part-time as head of innovation and curriculum development for Gaia Education. His first book Designing Regenerative Cultures was published by Triarchy Press earlier this year.

England’s top natural environment watchdog is planning to rein in its regulatory powers and seek more funding from the corporations it assesses, documents leaked to Energydesk reveal.

A source inside Natural England who spoke to Energydesk on condition of anonymity said the body is becoming more reluctant to regulate and warned that if the trend continues “we wouldn’t have any teeth any more”.

Meanwhile, a leading conservationist charity told Energydesk that the regulator is already withdrawing its opposition on local planning decisions concerning wildlife habitats on a “widespread and significant” level across the country.

The news comes as the regulator is set to play a significant role if the UK’s existing environmental regulations – most of which derive from EU membership – are changed as a result of Brexit.

Prominent environmentalist Stanley Johnson – a former Tory MEP and father to Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – called for the government to stand by “the central importance” of the watchdog in light of the environmental implications of the recent vote to leave the EU.

The RSPB warned that the leak reveals “troubling trends [that] look set to continue.”

Leaked documents

The leaked documents (links at foot of article) show that the body is seeking more than £12m in funding from business, including firms that it regulates, by 2020. That amounts to more than an eightfold increase on current levels. The move comes in expectation of a budget cut of up to £30m by 2020, a 27% cutback on 2015/16, the documents say.

In a paper called ‘Towards 2020 – what sort of organisation will Natural England be in 2020?”, which Energydesk understands was circulated internally in June, a number of changes are outlined. It states the watchdog should:

• “make more proportionate use of our regulatory powers”
• “provide advice to government that is politically aware and based clearly on our local knowledge”
• “evolve the way we develop and use our evidence, and how we share it so that it underpins decisions”
• “do more work in collaboration with our Defra [UK government] partners both on the ground (where we will operate to aligned boundaries and with shared plans) and at the national level around policy development”

The document is understood to have raised concerns within the body that the regulator may make less use of its regulatory powers and be more susceptible to political and corporate pressure.

The RSPB said: “Natural England has already been subject to huge reductions in its capacity to do its vital job, and the current political context means that it has increasingly moved away from using the full range of tools available to protect and restore nature. This document makes clear that those troubling trends look set to continue”.

Brexit worries

Natural England is responsible for enforcing laws that protect wildlife and nature, managing the influence of developers and promoting biodiversity and public access to the countryside.

It designates protected areas, issues licences to developers wishing to disturb wildlife and habitats and distributes grants that support farmers to protect them. They also have the power to take legal action.

The potential weakening of Natural England comes at a sensitive time because the UK is in the midst of negotiations to leave the European Union. Most UK laws on nature and habitats derive from EU directives which ensure they are enforced in the courts.

Johnson, co-chair of Environmentalists for Europe, said: “This story, if confirmed, would be very worrying. In a Brexit situation, it will be vital to ensure that the protection of nature and wildlife offered by EU directives, as well as the measures already taken under EU rules in the fight against air and water pollution, and climate change, are pursued with vigour. Natural England’s role here is clearly vital.”

The watchdog with ‘no teeth’

A Natural England insider said that the agency is likely to take fewer legal actions against developers or landowners that infringe its rules. “We will go to court less often and try to find compromises more often. From a conservationist point of view that’s quite worrying because we wouldn’t have teeth any more”, the source said.

Three weeks ago the RSPB withdrew from the government’s voluntary scheme to halt the decline of hen harriers, which the NGO says are a victim of “illegal killing” on moors used for the shooting of grouse. It was launched in January by the government together with a number of conservationist groups, including the RSPB, and is being implemented chiefly by Natural England.

The RSPB has called for the government to introduce a licensing system whereby estates could have their licenses revoked. Asked if this could represent an example of the watchdog reining in its regulatory powers, the source at Natural England said:

“Definitely. I think we would have been more forceful. We are not enforcing in the way we would have done in the past. We’re prepared to accept compromises we weren’t before. Where will we draw the line?”

But the weakening of Natural England’s regulatory powers is having a much more comprehensive impact on wildlife and habitats on a local level across the country, according to the Wildlife Trusts, which works to conserve wildlife across the UK.

NE’s already failing to object to damaging developments

“Wildlife Trusts across the country have seen Natural England’s reluctance to stand up for nature in local planning decisions on a regular basis”, said Steve Trotter, director for England at the Wildlife Trusts.

“Natural England seems uninterested in getting involved in challenging inappropriate developments that are proposed on important habitats, particularly local wildlife sites, which don’t have legal protection. It’s a widespread and significant issue.”

Trotter added: “When local planning authorities or developers don’t see any comments from Natural England on a development, they conclude there is no problem – which is not always the case.”

The Trust says that Natural England is withdrawing objections “at the last moment” from local cases that go to judicial review, citing a case that the Devon Wildlife Trust lost at the High Court a year ago. Concerning one of the country’s most endangered mammals.

The court ruled not to overturn a planning decision that gave a developer permission to build a housing estate close to one of the last remaining habitats of greater horseshoe bats in the UK. A spokesperson at Natural England declined to put any comments on the record regarding their role in the case.

Environmentalists started to raise concerns about Natural England’s role as a regulator and independent advisor some years ago.

In 2012, it pulled its legal inquiry into the burning of blanket bog on a shooting estate in the Pennines. The bogs are of a type only found in a few places in the world and are protected by the EU Habitats directives. In April the European Commission launched a legal infringement inquiry on the issue and is awaiting a response from the UK government.

Commercial funding from developers will not impair ‘objectivity’

The leaked paper also says the organisation is “making great strides in the way we generate income other sources”, partially by providing paid consultancy services to private firms looking to develop in sensitive areas.

Their latest annual report, published in July, shows that the body is already taking money from energy giant EDF for providing advice on its plans to build a new nuclear power station at Sizewell on the Suffolk coast.

“In Suffolk we have continued to develop our positive relationship with EDF through our discretionary chargeable advice and a project team approach to the Sizewell Nuclear New Build”, the report claims.

It suggests that other energy companies as well as housing developers and transport companies working on large infrastructure projects are also paying it on a similar basis. “Though we may have provided advice, once applications are received, these are reviewed with objectivity”, the report notes.

‘Ecologists not consultants’

The insider at Natural England said that while this method of working enables them to raise environmental issues with developers early, it is “based on the priorities of developers and not the most threatened species or habitats, which could become neglected.”

“It doesn’t sit very well with a lot of people in Natural England”, the source said. “We are here to be ecologists not consultants. Our staff resource will be increasingly focused on work where there is a financial incentive rather than a conservation concern.”

The leaked internal documents show that other employees have raised concerns that the body will become “a consultancy” or that the new funding model could “drive away people who want our advice” and occupy too much company time.

In the documents, Natural England responded to such concerns by stating that their role is different from consultants because they “provide early awareness of our likely statutory advice” and do not “run scoping exercises design and conduct survey work, write reports or design and implement mitigation proposals”.

They also note that the Environment Agency and the Marine Management Organisation are already using similar funding models.

NE: ‘Nothing has changed’

A Natural England spokesperson said: “There has been absolutely no change in Natural England’s statutory role or driving mission to protect and enhance the country’s nature, habitats and landscapes as laid out under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.”

“However, we are improving the way we operate through implementing recommendations that were made in Sir John Lawton’s independent Making Space for Nature report (2010) and welcomed by government and NGOs alike.”

“Working with communities and stakeholders ever more efficiently, we will assess challenges and implement solutions on a ‘landscape scale’, always focussing on the ultimate outcome: an improved environment for all of us.”

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs declined to comment on the findings.

Emma Howard is a writer for Greenpeace Energydesk. She tweets @EmmaEHoward.

This article was originally published on Greenpeace Energydesk.

The leaked documents

Page 1; Page 2; Page 3; Page 4; Page 5; Page 6; Page 7; Page 8; Page 9; Page 10; Page 11; Page 12; Page 13; Page 14; Page 15; Page 16; Page 17; Page 18; Page 19.

England’s top natural environment watchdog is planning to rein in its regulatory powers and seek more funding from the corporations it assesses, documents leaked to Energydesk reveal.

A source inside Natural England who spoke to Energydesk on condition of anonymity said the body is becoming more reluctant to regulate and warned that if the trend continues “we wouldn’t have any teeth any more”.

Meanwhile, a leading conservationist charity told Energydesk that the regulator is already withdrawing its opposition on local planning decisions concerning wildlife habitats on a “widespread and significant” level across the country.

The news comes as the regulator is set to play a significant role if the UK’s existing environmental regulations – most of which derive from EU membership – are changed as a result of Brexit.

Prominent environmentalist Stanley Johnson – a former Tory MEP and father to Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – called for the government to stand by “the central importance” of the watchdog in light of the environmental implications of the recent vote to leave the EU.

The RSPB warned that the leak reveals “troubling trends [that] look set to continue.”

Leaked documents

The leaked documents (links at foot of article) show that the body is seeking more than £12m in funding from business, including firms that it regulates, by 2020. That amounts to more than an eightfold increase on current levels. The move comes in expectation of a budget cut of up to £30m by 2020, a 27% cutback on 2015/16, the documents say.

In a paper called ‘Towards 2020 – what sort of organisation will Natural England be in 2020?”, which Energydesk understands was circulated internally in June, a number of changes are outlined. It states the watchdog should:

• “make more proportionate use of our regulatory powers”
• “provide advice to government that is politically aware and based clearly on our local knowledge”
• “evolve the way we develop and use our evidence, and how we share it so that it underpins decisions”
• “do more work in collaboration with our Defra [UK government] partners both on the ground (where we will operate to aligned boundaries and with shared plans) and at the national level around policy development”

The document is understood to have raised concerns within the body that the regulator may make less use of its regulatory powers and be more susceptible to political and corporate pressure.

The RSPB said: “Natural England has already been subject to huge reductions in its capacity to do its vital job, and the current political context means that it has increasingly moved away from using the full range of tools available to protect and restore nature. This document makes clear that those troubling trends look set to continue”.

Brexit worries

Natural England is responsible for enforcing laws that protect wildlife and nature, managing the influence of developers and promoting biodiversity and public access to the countryside.

It designates protected areas, issues licences to developers wishing to disturb wildlife and habitats and distributes grants that support farmers to protect them. They also have the power to take legal action.

The potential weakening of Natural England comes at a sensitive time because the UK is in the midst of negotiations to leave the European Union. Most UK laws on nature and habitats derive from EU directives which ensure they are enforced in the courts.

Johnson, co-chair of Environmentalists for Europe, said: “This story, if confirmed, would be very worrying. In a Brexit situation, it will be vital to ensure that the protection of nature and wildlife offered by EU directives, as well as the measures already taken under EU rules in the fight against air and water pollution, and climate change, are pursued with vigour. Natural England’s role here is clearly vital.”

The watchdog with ‘no teeth’

A Natural England insider said that the agency is likely to take fewer legal actions against developers or landowners that infringe its rules. “We will go to court less often and try to find compromises more often. From a conservationist point of view that’s quite worrying because we wouldn’t have teeth any more”, the source said.

Three weeks ago the RSPB withdrew from the government’s voluntary scheme to halt the decline of hen harriers, which the NGO says are a victim of “illegal killing” on moors used for the shooting of grouse. It was launched in January by the government together with a number of conservationist groups, including the RSPB, and is being implemented chiefly by Natural England.

The RSPB has called for the government to introduce a licensing system whereby estates could have their licenses revoked. Asked if this could represent an example of the watchdog reining in its regulatory powers, the source at Natural England said:

“Definitely. I think we would have been more forceful. We are not enforcing in the way we would have done in the past. We’re prepared to accept compromises we weren’t before. Where will we draw the line?”

But the weakening of Natural England’s regulatory powers is having a much more comprehensive impact on wildlife and habitats on a local level across the country, according to the Wildlife Trusts, which works to conserve wildlife across the UK.

NE’s already failing to object to damaging developments

“Wildlife Trusts across the country have seen Natural England’s reluctance to stand up for nature in local planning decisions on a regular basis”, said Steve Trotter, director for England at the Wildlife Trusts.

“Natural England seems uninterested in getting involved in challenging inappropriate developments that are proposed on important habitats, particularly local wildlife sites, which don’t have legal protection. It’s a widespread and significant issue.”

Trotter added: “When local planning authorities or developers don’t see any comments from Natural England on a development, they conclude there is no problem – which is not always the case.”

The Trust says that Natural England is withdrawing objections “at the last moment” from local cases that go to judicial review, citing a case that the Devon Wildlife Trust lost at the High Court a year ago. Concerning one of the country’s most endangered mammals.

The court ruled not to overturn a planning decision that gave a developer permission to build a housing estate close to one of the last remaining habitats of greater horseshoe bats in the UK. A spokesperson at Natural England declined to put any comments on the record regarding their role in the case.

Environmentalists started to raise concerns about Natural England’s role as a regulator and independent advisor some years ago.

In 2012, it pulled its legal inquiry into the burning of blanket bog on a shooting estate in the Pennines. The bogs are of a type only found in a few places in the world and are protected by the EU Habitats directives. In April the European Commission launched a legal infringement inquiry on the issue and is awaiting a response from the UK government.

Commercial funding from developers will not impair ‘objectivity’

The leaked paper also says the organisation is “making great strides in the way we generate income other sources”, partially by providing paid consultancy services to private firms looking to develop in sensitive areas.

Their latest annual report, published in July, shows that the body is already taking money from energy giant EDF for providing advice on its plans to build a new nuclear power station at Sizewell on the Suffolk coast.

“In Suffolk we have continued to develop our positive relationship with EDF through our discretionary chargeable advice and a project team approach to the Sizewell Nuclear New Build”, the report claims.

It suggests that other energy companies as well as housing developers and transport companies working on large infrastructure projects are also paying it on a similar basis. “Though we may have provided advice, once applications are received, these are reviewed with objectivity”, the report notes.

‘Ecologists not consultants’

The insider at Natural England said that while this method of working enables them to raise environmental issues with developers early, it is “based on the priorities of developers and not the most threatened species or habitats, which could become neglected.”

“It doesn’t sit very well with a lot of people in Natural England”, the source said. “We are here to be ecologists not consultants. Our staff resource will be increasingly focused on work where there is a financial incentive rather than a conservation concern.”

The leaked internal documents show that other employees have raised concerns that the body will become “a consultancy” or that the new funding model could “drive away people who want our advice” and occupy too much company time.

In the documents, Natural England responded to such concerns by stating that their role is different from consultants because they “provide early awareness of our likely statutory advice” and do not “run scoping exercises design and conduct survey work, write reports or design and implement mitigation proposals”.

They also note that the Environment Agency and the Marine Management Organisation are already using similar funding models.

NE: ‘Nothing has changed’

A Natural England spokesperson said: “There has been absolutely no change in Natural England’s statutory role or driving mission to protect and enhance the country’s nature, habitats and landscapes as laid out under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.”

“However, we are improving the way we operate through implementing recommendations that were made in Sir John Lawton’s independent Making Space for Nature report (2010) and welcomed by government and NGOs alike.”

“Working with communities and stakeholders ever more efficiently, we will assess challenges and implement solutions on a ‘landscape scale’, always focussing on the ultimate outcome: an improved environment for all of us.”

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs declined to comment on the findings.

Emma Howard is a writer for Greenpeace Energydesk. She tweets @EmmaEHoward.

This article was originally published on Greenpeace Energydesk.

The leaked documents

Page 1; Page 2; Page 3; Page 4; Page 5; Page 6; Page 7; Page 8; Page 9; Page 10; Page 11; Page 12; Page 13; Page 14; Page 15; Page 16; Page 17; Page 18; Page 19.

England’s top natural environment watchdog is planning to rein in its regulatory powers and seek more funding from the corporations it assesses, documents leaked to Energydesk reveal.

A source inside Natural England who spoke to Energydesk on condition of anonymity said the body is becoming more reluctant to regulate and warned that if the trend continues “we wouldn’t have any teeth any more”.

Meanwhile, a leading conservationist charity told Energydesk that the regulator is already withdrawing its opposition on local planning decisions concerning wildlife habitats on a “widespread and significant” level across the country.

The news comes as the regulator is set to play a significant role if the UK’s existing environmental regulations – most of which derive from EU membership – are changed as a result of Brexit.

Prominent environmentalist Stanley Johnson – a former Tory MEP and father to Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – called for the government to stand by “the central importance” of the watchdog in light of the environmental implications of the recent vote to leave the EU.

The RSPB warned that the leak reveals “troubling trends [that] look set to continue.”

Leaked documents

The leaked documents (links at foot of article) show that the body is seeking more than £12m in funding from business, including firms that it regulates, by 2020. That amounts to more than an eightfold increase on current levels. The move comes in expectation of a budget cut of up to £30m by 2020, a 27% cutback on 2015/16, the documents say.

In a paper called ‘Towards 2020 – what sort of organisation will Natural England be in 2020?”, which Energydesk understands was circulated internally in June, a number of changes are outlined. It states the watchdog should:

• “make more proportionate use of our regulatory powers”
• “provide advice to government that is politically aware and based clearly on our local knowledge”
• “evolve the way we develop and use our evidence, and how we share it so that it underpins decisions”
• “do more work in collaboration with our Defra [UK government] partners both on the ground (where we will operate to aligned boundaries and with shared plans) and at the national level around policy development”

The document is understood to have raised concerns within the body that the regulator may make less use of its regulatory powers and be more susceptible to political and corporate pressure.

The RSPB said: “Natural England has already been subject to huge reductions in its capacity to do its vital job, and the current political context means that it has increasingly moved away from using the full range of tools available to protect and restore nature. This document makes clear that those troubling trends look set to continue”.

Brexit worries

Natural England is responsible for enforcing laws that protect wildlife and nature, managing the influence of developers and promoting biodiversity and public access to the countryside.

It designates protected areas, issues licences to developers wishing to disturb wildlife and habitats and distributes grants that support farmers to protect them. They also have the power to take legal action.

The potential weakening of Natural England comes at a sensitive time because the UK is in the midst of negotiations to leave the European Union. Most UK laws on nature and habitats derive from EU directives which ensure they are enforced in the courts.

Johnson, co-chair of Environmentalists for Europe, said: “This story, if confirmed, would be very worrying. In a Brexit situation, it will be vital to ensure that the protection of nature and wildlife offered by EU directives, as well as the measures already taken under EU rules in the fight against air and water pollution, and climate change, are pursued with vigour. Natural England’s role here is clearly vital.”

The watchdog with ‘no teeth’

A Natural England insider said that the agency is likely to take fewer legal actions against developers or landowners that infringe its rules. “We will go to court less often and try to find compromises more often. From a conservationist point of view that’s quite worrying because we wouldn’t have teeth any more”, the source said.

Three weeks ago the RSPB withdrew from the government’s voluntary scheme to halt the decline of hen harriers, which the NGO says are a victim of “illegal killing” on moors used for the shooting of grouse. It was launched in January by the government together with a number of conservationist groups, including the RSPB, and is being implemented chiefly by Natural England.

The RSPB has called for the government to introduce a licensing system whereby estates could have their licenses revoked. Asked if this could represent an example of the watchdog reining in its regulatory powers, the source at Natural England said:

“Definitely. I think we would have been more forceful. We are not enforcing in the way we would have done in the past. We’re prepared to accept compromises we weren’t before. Where will we draw the line?”

But the weakening of Natural England’s regulatory powers is having a much more comprehensive impact on wildlife and habitats on a local level across the country, according to the Wildlife Trusts, which works to conserve wildlife across the UK.

NE’s already failing to object to damaging developments

“Wildlife Trusts across the country have seen Natural England’s reluctance to stand up for nature in local planning decisions on a regular basis”, said Steve Trotter, director for England at the Wildlife Trusts.

“Natural England seems uninterested in getting involved in challenging inappropriate developments that are proposed on important habitats, particularly local wildlife sites, which don’t have legal protection. It’s a widespread and significant issue.”

Trotter added: “When local planning authorities or developers don’t see any comments from Natural England on a development, they conclude there is no problem – which is not always the case.”

The Trust says that Natural England is withdrawing objections “at the last moment” from local cases that go to judicial review, citing a case that the Devon Wildlife Trust lost at the High Court a year ago. Concerning one of the country’s most endangered mammals.

The court ruled not to overturn a planning decision that gave a developer permission to build a housing estate close to one of the last remaining habitats of greater horseshoe bats in the UK. A spokesperson at Natural England declined to put any comments on the record regarding their role in the case.

Environmentalists started to raise concerns about Natural England’s role as a regulator and independent advisor some years ago.

In 2012, it pulled its legal inquiry into the burning of blanket bog on a shooting estate in the Pennines. The bogs are of a type only found in a few places in the world and are protected by the EU Habitats directives. In April the European Commission launched a legal infringement inquiry on the issue and is awaiting a response from the UK government.

Commercial funding from developers will not impair ‘objectivity’

The leaked paper also says the organisation is “making great strides in the way we generate income other sources”, partially by providing paid consultancy services to private firms looking to develop in sensitive areas.

Their latest annual report, published in July, shows that the body is already taking money from energy giant EDF for providing advice on its plans to build a new nuclear power station at Sizewell on the Suffolk coast.

“In Suffolk we have continued to develop our positive relationship with EDF through our discretionary chargeable advice and a project team approach to the Sizewell Nuclear New Build”, the report claims.

It suggests that other energy companies as well as housing developers and transport companies working on large infrastructure projects are also paying it on a similar basis. “Though we may have provided advice, once applications are received, these are reviewed with objectivity”, the report notes.

‘Ecologists not consultants’

The insider at Natural England said that while this method of working enables them to raise environmental issues with developers early, it is “based on the priorities of developers and not the most threatened species or habitats, which could become neglected.”

“It doesn’t sit very well with a lot of people in Natural England”, the source said. “We are here to be ecologists not consultants. Our staff resource will be increasingly focused on work where there is a financial incentive rather than a conservation concern.”

The leaked internal documents show that other employees have raised concerns that the body will become “a consultancy” or that the new funding model could “drive away people who want our advice” and occupy too much company time.

In the documents, Natural England responded to such concerns by stating that their role is different from consultants because they “provide early awareness of our likely statutory advice” and do not “run scoping exercises design and conduct survey work, write reports or design and implement mitigation proposals”.

They also note that the Environment Agency and the Marine Management Organisation are already using similar funding models.

NE: ‘Nothing has changed’

A Natural England spokesperson said: “There has been absolutely no change in Natural England’s statutory role or driving mission to protect and enhance the country’s nature, habitats and landscapes as laid out under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.”

“However, we are improving the way we operate through implementing recommendations that were made in Sir John Lawton’s independent Making Space for Nature report (2010) and welcomed by government and NGOs alike.”

“Working with communities and stakeholders ever more efficiently, we will assess challenges and implement solutions on a ‘landscape scale’, always focussing on the ultimate outcome: an improved environment for all of us.”

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs declined to comment on the findings.

Emma Howard is a writer for Greenpeace Energydesk. She tweets @EmmaEHoward.

This article was originally published on Greenpeace Energydesk.

The leaked documents

Page 1; Page 2; Page 3; Page 4; Page 5; Page 6; Page 7; Page 8; Page 9; Page 10; Page 11; Page 12; Page 13; Page 14; Page 15; Page 16; Page 17; Page 18; Page 19.

England’s top natural environment watchdog is planning to rein in its regulatory powers and seek more funding from the corporations it assesses, documents leaked to Energydesk reveal.

A source inside Natural England who spoke to Energydesk on condition of anonymity said the body is becoming more reluctant to regulate and warned that if the trend continues “we wouldn’t have any teeth any more”.

Meanwhile, a leading conservationist charity told Energydesk that the regulator is already withdrawing its opposition on local planning decisions concerning wildlife habitats on a “widespread and significant” level across the country.

The news comes as the regulator is set to play a significant role if the UK’s existing environmental regulations – most of which derive from EU membership – are changed as a result of Brexit.

Prominent environmentalist Stanley Johnson – a former Tory MEP and father to Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – called for the government to stand by “the central importance” of the watchdog in light of the environmental implications of the recent vote to leave the EU.

The RSPB warned that the leak reveals “troubling trends [that] look set to continue.”

Leaked documents

The leaked documents (links at foot of article) show that the body is seeking more than £12m in funding from business, including firms that it regulates, by 2020. That amounts to more than an eightfold increase on current levels. The move comes in expectation of a budget cut of up to £30m by 2020, a 27% cutback on 2015/16, the documents say.

In a paper called ‘Towards 2020 – what sort of organisation will Natural England be in 2020?”, which Energydesk understands was circulated internally in June, a number of changes are outlined. It states the watchdog should:

• “make more proportionate use of our regulatory powers”
• “provide advice to government that is politically aware and based clearly on our local knowledge”
• “evolve the way we develop and use our evidence, and how we share it so that it underpins decisions”
• “do more work in collaboration with our Defra [UK government] partners both on the ground (where we will operate to aligned boundaries and with shared plans) and at the national level around policy development”

The document is understood to have raised concerns within the body that the regulator may make less use of its regulatory powers and be more susceptible to political and corporate pressure.

The RSPB said: “Natural England has already been subject to huge reductions in its capacity to do its vital job, and the current political context means that it has increasingly moved away from using the full range of tools available to protect and restore nature. This document makes clear that those troubling trends look set to continue”.

Brexit worries

Natural England is responsible for enforcing laws that protect wildlife and nature, managing the influence of developers and promoting biodiversity and public access to the countryside.

It designates protected areas, issues licences to developers wishing to disturb wildlife and habitats and distributes grants that support farmers to protect them. They also have the power to take legal action.

The potential weakening of Natural England comes at a sensitive time because the UK is in the midst of negotiations to leave the European Union. Most UK laws on nature and habitats derive from EU directives which ensure they are enforced in the courts.

Johnson, co-chair of Environmentalists for Europe, said: “This story, if confirmed, would be very worrying. In a Brexit situation, it will be vital to ensure that the protection of nature and wildlife offered by EU directives, as well as the measures already taken under EU rules in the fight against air and water pollution, and climate change, are pursued with vigour. Natural England’s role here is clearly vital.”

The watchdog with ‘no teeth’

A Natural England insider said that the agency is likely to take fewer legal actions against developers or landowners that infringe its rules. “We will go to court less often and try to find compromises more often. From a conservationist point of view that’s quite worrying because we wouldn’t have teeth any more”, the source said.

Three weeks ago the RSPB withdrew from the government’s voluntary scheme to halt the decline of hen harriers, which the NGO says are a victim of “illegal killing” on moors used for the shooting of grouse. It was launched in January by the government together with a number of conservationist groups, including the RSPB, and is being implemented chiefly by Natural England.

The RSPB has called for the government to introduce a licensing system whereby estates could have their licenses revoked. Asked if this could represent an example of the watchdog reining in its regulatory powers, the source at Natural England said:

“Definitely. I think we would have been more forceful. We are not enforcing in the way we would have done in the past. We’re prepared to accept compromises we weren’t before. Where will we draw the line?”

But the weakening of Natural England’s regulatory powers is having a much more comprehensive impact on wildlife and habitats on a local level across the country, according to the Wildlife Trusts, which works to conserve wildlife across the UK.

NE’s already failing to object to damaging developments

“Wildlife Trusts across the country have seen Natural England’s reluctance to stand up for nature in local planning decisions on a regular basis”, said Steve Trotter, director for England at the Wildlife Trusts.

“Natural England seems uninterested in getting involved in challenging inappropriate developments that are proposed on important habitats, particularly local wildlife sites, which don’t have legal protection. It’s a widespread and significant issue.”

Trotter added: “When local planning authorities or developers don’t see any comments from Natural England on a development, they conclude there is no problem – which is not always the case.”

The Trust says that Natural England is withdrawing objections “at the last moment” from local cases that go to judicial review, citing a case that the Devon Wildlife Trust lost at the High Court a year ago. Concerning one of the country’s most endangered mammals.

The court ruled not to overturn a planning decision that gave a developer permission to build a housing estate close to one of the last remaining habitats of greater horseshoe bats in the UK. A spokesperson at Natural England declined to put any comments on the record regarding their role in the case.

Environmentalists started to raise concerns about Natural England’s role as a regulator and independent advisor some years ago.

In 2012, it pulled its legal inquiry into the burning of blanket bog on a shooting estate in the Pennines. The bogs are of a type only found in a few places in the world and are protected by the EU Habitats directives. In April the European Commission launched a legal infringement inquiry on the issue and is awaiting a response from the UK government.

Commercial funding from developers will not impair ‘objectivity’

The leaked paper also says the organisation is “making great strides in the way we generate income other sources”, partially by providing paid consultancy services to private firms looking to develop in sensitive areas.

Their latest annual report, published in July, shows that the body is already taking money from energy giant EDF for providing advice on its plans to build a new nuclear power station at Sizewell on the Suffolk coast.

“In Suffolk we have continued to develop our positive relationship with EDF through our discretionary chargeable advice and a project team approach to the Sizewell Nuclear New Build”, the report claims.

It suggests that other energy companies as well as housing developers and transport companies working on large infrastructure projects are also paying it on a similar basis. “Though we may have provided advice, once applications are received, these are reviewed with objectivity”, the report notes.

‘Ecologists not consultants’

The insider at Natural England said that while this method of working enables them to raise environmental issues with developers early, it is “based on the priorities of developers and not the most threatened species or habitats, which could become neglected.”

“It doesn’t sit very well with a lot of people in Natural England”, the source said. “We are here to be ecologists not consultants. Our staff resource will be increasingly focused on work where there is a financial incentive rather than a conservation concern.”

The leaked internal documents show that other employees have raised concerns that the body will become “a consultancy” or that the new funding model could “drive away people who want our advice” and occupy too much company time.

In the documents, Natural England responded to such concerns by stating that their role is different from consultants because they “provide early awareness of our likely statutory advice” and do not “run scoping exercises design and conduct survey work, write reports or design and implement mitigation proposals”.

They also note that the Environment Agency and the Marine Management Organisation are already using similar funding models.

NE: ‘Nothing has changed’

A Natural England spokesperson said: “There has been absolutely no change in Natural England’s statutory role or driving mission to protect and enhance the country’s nature, habitats and landscapes as laid out under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.”

“However, we are improving the way we operate through implementing recommendations that were made in Sir John Lawton’s independent Making Space for Nature report (2010) and welcomed by government and NGOs alike.”

“Working with communities and stakeholders ever more efficiently, we will assess challenges and implement solutions on a ‘landscape scale’, always focussing on the ultimate outcome: an improved environment for all of us.”

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs declined to comment on the findings.

Emma Howard is a writer for Greenpeace Energydesk. She tweets @EmmaEHoward.

This article was originally published on Greenpeace Energydesk.

The leaked documents

Page 1; Page 2; Page 3; Page 4; Page 5; Page 6; Page 7; Page 8; Page 9; Page 10; Page 11; Page 12; Page 13; Page 14; Page 15; Page 16; Page 17; Page 18; Page 19.

England’s top natural environment watchdog is planning to rein in its regulatory powers and seek more funding from the corporations it assesses, documents leaked to Energydesk reveal.

A source inside Natural England who spoke to Energydesk on condition of anonymity said the body is becoming more reluctant to regulate and warned that if the trend continues “we wouldn’t have any teeth any more”.

Meanwhile, a leading conservationist charity told Energydesk that the regulator is already withdrawing its opposition on local planning decisions concerning wildlife habitats on a “widespread and significant” level across the country.

The news comes as the regulator is set to play a significant role if the UK’s existing environmental regulations – most of which derive from EU membership – are changed as a result of Brexit.

Prominent environmentalist Stanley Johnson – a former Tory MEP and father to Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – called for the government to stand by “the central importance” of the watchdog in light of the environmental implications of the recent vote to leave the EU.

The RSPB warned that the leak reveals “troubling trends [that] look set to continue.”

Leaked documents

The leaked documents (links at foot of article) show that the body is seeking more than £12m in funding from business, including firms that it regulates, by 2020. That amounts to more than an eightfold increase on current levels. The move comes in expectation of a budget cut of up to £30m by 2020, a 27% cutback on 2015/16, the documents say.

In a paper called ‘Towards 2020 – what sort of organisation will Natural England be in 2020?”, which Energydesk understands was circulated internally in June, a number of changes are outlined. It states the watchdog should:

• “make more proportionate use of our regulatory powers”
• “provide advice to government that is politically aware and based clearly on our local knowledge”
• “evolve the way we develop and use our evidence, and how we share it so that it underpins decisions”
• “do more work in collaboration with our Defra [UK government] partners both on the ground (where we will operate to aligned boundaries and with shared plans) and at the national level around policy development”

The document is understood to have raised concerns within the body that the regulator may make less use of its regulatory powers and be more susceptible to political and corporate pressure.

The RSPB said: “Natural England has already been subject to huge reductions in its capacity to do its vital job, and the current political context means that it has increasingly moved away from using the full range of tools available to protect and restore nature. This document makes clear that those troubling trends look set to continue”.

Brexit worries

Natural England is responsible for enforcing laws that protect wildlife and nature, managing the influence of developers and promoting biodiversity and public access to the countryside.

It designates protected areas, issues licences to developers wishing to disturb wildlife and habitats and distributes grants that support farmers to protect them. They also have the power to take legal action.

The potential weakening of Natural England comes at a sensitive time because the UK is in the midst of negotiations to leave the European Union. Most UK laws on nature and habitats derive from EU directives which ensure they are enforced in the courts.

Johnson, co-chair of Environmentalists for Europe, said: “This story, if confirmed, would be very worrying. In a Brexit situation, it will be vital to ensure that the protection of nature and wildlife offered by EU directives, as well as the measures already taken under EU rules in the fight against air and water pollution, and climate change, are pursued with vigour. Natural England’s role here is clearly vital.”

The watchdog with ‘no teeth’

A Natural England insider said that the agency is likely to take fewer legal actions against developers or landowners that infringe its rules. “We will go to court less often and try to find compromises more often. From a conservationist point of view that’s quite worrying because we wouldn’t have teeth any more”, the source said.

Three weeks ago the RSPB withdrew from the government’s voluntary scheme to halt the decline of hen harriers, which the NGO says are a victim of “illegal killing” on moors used for the shooting of grouse. It was launched in January by the government together with a number of conservationist groups, including the RSPB, and is being implemented chiefly by Natural England.

The RSPB has called for the government to introduce a licensing system whereby estates could have their licenses revoked. Asked if this could represent an example of the watchdog reining in its regulatory powers, the source at Natural England said:

“Definitely. I think we would have been more forceful. We are not enforcing in the way we would have done in the past. We’re prepared to accept compromises we weren’t before. Where will we draw the line?”

But the weakening of Natural England’s regulatory powers is having a much more comprehensive impact on wildlife and habitats on a local level across the country, according to the Wildlife Trusts, which works to conserve wildlife across the UK.

NE’s already failing to object to damaging developments

“Wildlife Trusts across the country have seen Natural England’s reluctance to stand up for nature in local planning decisions on a regular basis”, said Steve Trotter, director for England at the Wildlife Trusts.

“Natural England seems uninterested in getting involved in challenging inappropriate developments that are proposed on important habitats, particularly local wildlife sites, which don’t have legal protection. It’s a widespread and significant issue.”

Trotter added: “When local planning authorities or developers don’t see any comments from Natural England on a development, they conclude there is no problem – which is not always the case.”

The Trust says that Natural England is withdrawing objections “at the last moment” from local cases that go to judicial review, citing a case that the Devon Wildlife Trust lost at the High Court a year ago. Concerning one of the country’s most endangered mammals.

The court ruled not to overturn a planning decision that gave a developer permission to build a housing estate close to one of the last remaining habitats of greater horseshoe bats in the UK. A spokesperson at Natural England declined to put any comments on the record regarding their role in the case.

Environmentalists started to raise concerns about Natural England’s role as a regulator and independent advisor some years ago.

In 2012, it pulled its legal inquiry into the burning of blanket bog on a shooting estate in the Pennines. The bogs are of a type only found in a few places in the world and are protected by the EU Habitats directives. In April the European Commission launched a legal infringement inquiry on the issue and is awaiting a response from the UK government.

Commercial funding from developers will not impair ‘objectivity’

The leaked paper also says the organisation is “making great strides in the way we generate income other sources”, partially by providing paid consultancy services to private firms looking to develop in sensitive areas.

Their latest annual report, published in July, shows that the body is already taking money from energy giant EDF for providing advice on its plans to build a new nuclear power station at Sizewell on the Suffolk coast.

“In Suffolk we have continued to develop our positive relationship with EDF through our discretionary chargeable advice and a project team approach to the Sizewell Nuclear New Build”, the report claims.

It suggests that other energy companies as well as housing developers and transport companies working on large infrastructure projects are also paying it on a similar basis. “Though we may have provided advice, once applications are received, these are reviewed with objectivity”, the report notes.

‘Ecologists not consultants’

The insider at Natural England said that while this method of working enables them to raise environmental issues with developers early, it is “based on the priorities of developers and not the most threatened species or habitats, which could become neglected.”

“It doesn’t sit very well with a lot of people in Natural England”, the source said. “We are here to be ecologists not consultants. Our staff resource will be increasingly focused on work where there is a financial incentive rather than a conservation concern.”

The leaked internal documents show that other employees have raised concerns that the body will become “a consultancy” or that the new funding model could “drive away people who want our advice” and occupy too much company time.

In the documents, Natural England responded to such concerns by stating that their role is different from consultants because they “provide early awareness of our likely statutory advice” and do not “run scoping exercises design and conduct survey work, write reports or design and implement mitigation proposals”.

They also note that the Environment Agency and the Marine Management Organisation are already using similar funding models.

NE: ‘Nothing has changed’

A Natural England spokesperson said: “There has been absolutely no change in Natural England’s statutory role or driving mission to protect and enhance the country’s nature, habitats and landscapes as laid out under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.”

“However, we are improving the way we operate through implementing recommendations that were made in Sir John Lawton’s independent Making Space for Nature report (2010) and welcomed by government and NGOs alike.”

“Working with communities and stakeholders ever more efficiently, we will assess challenges and implement solutions on a ‘landscape scale’, always focussing on the ultimate outcome: an improved environment for all of us.”

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs declined to comment on the findings.

Emma Howard is a writer for Greenpeace Energydesk. She tweets @EmmaEHoward.

This article was originally published on Greenpeace Energydesk.

The leaked documents

Page 1; Page 2; Page 3; Page 4; Page 5; Page 6; Page 7; Page 8; Page 9; Page 10; Page 11; Page 12; Page 13; Page 14; Page 15; Page 16; Page 17; Page 18; Page 19.

England’s top natural environment watchdog is planning to rein in its regulatory powers and seek more funding from the corporations it assesses, documents leaked to Energydesk reveal.

A source inside Natural England who spoke to Energydesk on condition of anonymity said the body is becoming more reluctant to regulate and warned that if the trend continues “we wouldn’t have any teeth any more”.

Meanwhile, a leading conservationist charity told Energydesk that the regulator is already withdrawing its opposition on local planning decisions concerning wildlife habitats on a “widespread and significant” level across the country.

The news comes as the regulator is set to play a significant role if the UK’s existing environmental regulations – most of which derive from EU membership – are changed as a result of Brexit.

Prominent environmentalist Stanley Johnson – a former Tory MEP and father to Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – called for the government to stand by “the central importance” of the watchdog in light of the environmental implications of the recent vote to leave the EU.

The RSPB warned that the leak reveals “troubling trends [that] look set to continue.”

Leaked documents

The leaked documents (links at foot of article) show that the body is seeking more than £12m in funding from business, including firms that it regulates, by 2020. That amounts to more than an eightfold increase on current levels. The move comes in expectation of a budget cut of up to £30m by 2020, a 27% cutback on 2015/16, the documents say.

In a paper called ‘Towards 2020 – what sort of organisation will Natural England be in 2020?”, which Energydesk understands was circulated internally in June, a number of changes are outlined. It states the watchdog should:

• “make more proportionate use of our regulatory powers”
• “provide advice to government that is politically aware and based clearly on our local knowledge”
• “evolve the way we develop and use our evidence, and how we share it so that it underpins decisions”
• “do more work in collaboration with our Defra [UK government] partners both on the ground (where we will operate to aligned boundaries and with shared plans) and at the national level around policy development”

The document is understood to have raised concerns within the body that the regulator may make less use of its regulatory powers and be more susceptible to political and corporate pressure.

The RSPB said: “Natural England has already been subject to huge reductions in its capacity to do its vital job, and the current political context means that it has increasingly moved away from using the full range of tools available to protect and restore nature. This document makes clear that those troubling trends look set to continue”.

Brexit worries

Natural England is responsible for enforcing laws that protect wildlife and nature, managing the influence of developers and promoting biodiversity and public access to the countryside.

It designates protected areas, issues licences to developers wishing to disturb wildlife and habitats and distributes grants that support farmers to protect them. They also have the power to take legal action.

The potential weakening of Natural England comes at a sensitive time because the UK is in the midst of negotiations to leave the European Union. Most UK laws on nature and habitats derive from EU directives which ensure they are enforced in the courts.

Johnson, co-chair of Environmentalists for Europe, said: “This story, if confirmed, would be very worrying. In a Brexit situation, it will be vital to ensure that the protection of nature and wildlife offered by EU directives, as well as the measures already taken under EU rules in the fight against air and water pollution, and climate change, are pursued with vigour. Natural England’s role here is clearly vital.”

The watchdog with ‘no teeth’

A Natural England insider said that the agency is likely to take fewer legal actions against developers or landowners that infringe its rules. “We will go to court less often and try to find compromises more often. From a conservationist point of view that’s quite worrying because we wouldn’t have teeth any more”, the source said.

Three weeks ago the RSPB withdrew from the government’s voluntary scheme to halt the decline of hen harriers, which the NGO says are a victim of “illegal killing” on moors used for the shooting of grouse. It was launched in January by the government together with a number of conservationist groups, including the RSPB, and is being implemented chiefly by Natural England.

The RSPB has called for the government to introduce a licensing system whereby estates could have their licenses revoked. Asked if this could represent an example of the watchdog reining in its regulatory powers, the source at Natural England said:

“Definitely. I think we would have been more forceful. We are not enforcing in the way we would have done in the past. We’re prepared to accept compromises we weren’t before. Where will we draw the line?”

But the weakening of Natural England’s regulatory powers is having a much more comprehensive impact on wildlife and habitats on a local level across the country, according to the Wildlife Trusts, which works to conserve wildlife across the UK.

NE’s already failing to object to damaging developments

“Wildlife Trusts across the country have seen Natural England’s reluctance to stand up for nature in local planning decisions on a regular basis”, said Steve Trotter, director for England at the Wildlife Trusts.

“Natural England seems uninterested in getting involved in challenging inappropriate developments that are proposed on important habitats, particularly local wildlife sites, which don’t have legal protection. It’s a widespread and significant issue.”

Trotter added: “When local planning authorities or developers don’t see any comments from Natural England on a development, they conclude there is no problem – which is not always the case.”

The Trust says that Natural England is withdrawing objections “at the last moment” from local cases that go to judicial review, citing a case that the Devon Wildlife Trust lost at the High Court a year ago. Concerning one of the country’s most endangered mammals.

The court ruled not to overturn a planning decision that gave a developer permission to build a housing estate close to one of the last remaining habitats of greater horseshoe bats in the UK. A spokesperson at Natural England declined to put any comments on the record regarding their role in the case.

Environmentalists started to raise concerns about Natural England’s role as a regulator and independent advisor some years ago.

In 2012, it pulled its legal inquiry into the burning of blanket bog on a shooting estate in the Pennines. The bogs are of a type only found in a few places in the world and are protected by the EU Habitats directives. In April the European Commission launched a legal infringement inquiry on the issue and is awaiting a response from the UK government.

Commercial funding from developers will not impair ‘objectivity’

The leaked paper also says the organisation is “making great strides in the way we generate income other sources”, partially by providing paid consultancy services to private firms looking to develop in sensitive areas.

Their latest annual report, published in July, shows that the body is already taking money from energy giant EDF for providing advice on its plans to build a new nuclear power station at Sizewell on the Suffolk coast.

“In Suffolk we have continued to develop our positive relationship with EDF through our discretionary chargeable advice and a project team approach to the Sizewell Nuclear New Build”, the report claims.

It suggests that other energy companies as well as housing developers and transport companies working on large infrastructure projects are also paying it on a similar basis. “Though we may have provided advice, once applications are received, these are reviewed with objectivity”, the report notes.

‘Ecologists not consultants’

The insider at Natural England said that while this method of working enables them to raise environmental issues with developers early, it is “based on the priorities of developers and not the most threatened species or habitats, which could become neglected.”

“It doesn’t sit very well with a lot of people in Natural England”, the source said. “We are here to be ecologists not consultants. Our staff resource will be increasingly focused on work where there is a financial incentive rather than a conservation concern.”

The leaked internal documents show that other employees have raised concerns that the body will become “a consultancy” or that the new funding model could “drive away people who want our advice” and occupy too much company time.

In the documents, Natural England responded to such concerns by stating that their role is different from consultants because they “provide early awareness of our likely statutory advice” and do not “run scoping exercises design and conduct survey work, write reports or design and implement mitigation proposals”.

They also note that the Environment Agency and the Marine Management Organisation are already using similar funding models.

NE: ‘Nothing has changed’

A Natural England spokesperson said: “There has been absolutely no change in Natural England’s statutory role or driving mission to protect and enhance the country’s nature, habitats and landscapes as laid out under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.”

“However, we are improving the way we operate through implementing recommendations that were made in Sir John Lawton’s independent Making Space for Nature report (2010) and welcomed by government and NGOs alike.”

“Working with communities and stakeholders ever more efficiently, we will assess challenges and implement solutions on a ‘landscape scale’, always focussing on the ultimate outcome: an improved environment for all of us.”

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs declined to comment on the findings.

Emma Howard is a writer for Greenpeace Energydesk. She tweets @EmmaEHoward.

This article was originally published on Greenpeace Energydesk.

The leaked documents

Page 1; Page 2; Page 3; Page 4; Page 5; Page 6; Page 7; Page 8; Page 9; Page 10; Page 11; Page 12; Page 13; Page 14; Page 15; Page 16; Page 17; Page 18; Page 19.