Monthly Archives: October 2019

Forest fires rage through Lebanon

At least ten thousand protestors marched in the streets of Lebanon against corruption and incompetence in a government that is fuelling economic stagnancy in one of the world’s most indebted countries.

Protestors chanted: “The people are exhausted”; “The people will bring down the regime.”

Lebanon is one of the world’s most heavily indebted states and, this week, the government unveiled a new tax to raise additional revenues – a charge of roughly $6 per month for calls on all voice over internet protocol (VoIP) apps such as WhatsApp and Facetime. The measure is expected to bring about $200 million in revenue per year.

Forest fires

The proposal met with intense backlash on social media and widespread protests in a country with only two mobile service providers. Both are state-owned and are among the most expensive in the region.

Paula Yacoubian, a former journalist and currently an opposition politician, said: “The people will not pay a single [Lebanese] pound on the platform it insults you [politicians] on.”

The proposal has since been revoked. But Fahad, a protestor in Beirut, said: “This isn’t about WhatsApp, this is about how this government is simply incapable of doing its job. They [politicians] would let the whole country burn if it meant they can make money.”

The protests also came just two days after the worst forest fires Lebanon had seen in at least a decade. These fires are still raging. 

In a single day last week, 120-200 fires spread out different parts of Lebanon – including in the mountains in the historic and well-preserved region of Chouf. The fires reached residential areas, forcing many people to evacuate in the middle of the night. The damage was worsened by a lack of resources to contain the fire.

Fire fighting 

Although forest management experts and environmental advocacy groups reportedly issued several warnings about the threat of forest wildfires at the beginning of the dry season, in early June, no serious measures were taken to implement fire prevention or forest management measures.

George Stacey, an analyst working with Norvergence, an environmental advocacy NGO, said: “Fires of these magnitude require a lot of resources to be put out that was clearly not available.”

Public anger increased when it was revealed that the country’s three firefighting helicopters had been out of service for years.

An investigation has began to hold those responsible to account, and neighboring countries are offering firefighting support. 

On Tuesday morning, Cyprus sent helicopters while Greece and Jordan also offered to send help, according to Lebanese newspaper The Daily Star. The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which is the UN peacekeeping force at the country’s border with Israel, also joined the efforts.

Stacey added: “Nothing was done to prevent these fires that were far from unexpected given the current rate of urbanization breaking into forests, as well the heatwave that occurred this summer and increased the risk of fires further.”

Climate breakdown

Nearly 65 percent of fires that occur in Lebanon do so in forested areas, according to a 2017 report, but fires will reach cities much quicker in future, as urbanization continues to expand.

Forests in Lebanon also have a very dense biomass which provides for ample fuel for fires to spread quickly.

Temperatures in October in Lebanon have been the highest by several degrees in recorded years. Greenpeace Lebanon has pointed out how these heightened temperatures increase the risk of wildfires.

Julien Jreissati, campaigner at Greenpeace Lebanon, said: “Whether these fires are of criminal origin or not, their extraordinary intensity and ferocity is being fuelled by climate change. 

“Indeed the unusual heat wave and high temperatures in October have dried out our soils and created the ideal conditions for these unprecedented fires to spread out at such speed and intensity.”

Lebanon is not the only country struggling with wildfires. A combination of weather and environmental factors have resulted in wide-spreading fires through the Amazon, Russia, Australia, the Arctic, and many other parts of the world in 2019.

Build resilience

Jreissati added: “This is not an isolated event as 2019 has been a year of unprecedented forest fires from Siberia to the Amazon, from the Canary Island to Indonesia, sending clear signals that our planet is burning and it is time to act like it.”

The Red Cross in Lebanon has identified that eighteen people have been hospitalised and 88 have received emergency medical care. One person is also confirmed dead while hundreds have lost their homes.

Jreissati concluded: “We urge the Lebanese government to declare a state of climate emergency, to develop and implement a national adaptation strategy to the impacts of climate change to build the country’s resilience to such extreme events.”

This Author 

Rabiya Jaffery is a freelance journalist and multimedia producer covering stories from the Middle East and South Asia. She reports on climate, culture, and conflicts. She tweets at @rabiyasdfghjkl.

The article was supported by a grant from Norvergence,  an NGO that supports climate-related advocacy work.

Image: Rakan Mazloum, Twitter

Greenwashing glitter

Some of the UK’s leading glitter retailers, brands and experts are warning that unscrupulous firms are misleading or, even worse, simply lying about the green credentials of their sparkly products to sell to the unsuspecting public.

Traditional glitter, a form of microplastic, received particularly bad press a few years ago because of its  toxic impact on marine life. 

The result of this was a huge surge in demand for environmentally friendly glitters. But, according to experts, many of the ‘green’ glitters that have come out of the woodwork aren’t actually as eco-friendly as they may sound.

Market disruption

Stephen Cotton, the commercial director of Ronald Britton Ltd, the inventors and manufacturers of Bioglitter, the world’s first naturally degradable glitter, said: “Glitter greenwashing is not to be underestimated.

“We are aware of a number of glitter sellers and manufacturers who are making misleading claims about the eco credentials of their products, and in some cases even counterfeiting test reports.

“In reality the glitter being sold is no better than plastic in terms of environmental microplastic pollution and is misleading well intentioned consumers.”

Some of the manufacturers greenwash their own products and then sell them on in bulk to unsuspecting retailers or nationwide brands that are looking to source eco-friendly glitters for use in cosmetic beauty products, or for coatings on products like clothing, flowers and stationery.

Cotton went on to say: “Whenever there is significant disruption to a market, like we find in the glitter industry at the moment, there is an opportunity for unscrupulous companies to capitalise on the initial confusion as the market is unfamiliar with new technologies and terms.  

Composting

“Unfortunately, the glitter market is not immune to this.  As the market leaders of eco-glitter technology, we feel that empowering the consumers and brand owners to make informed decisions on their purchasing choices, through awareness and increased knowledge around the subject, is essential.  

“It will also enable the industry to quickly move through this phase as the market becomes more familiar with the new standards that products need to achieve to make the cut as truly eco-friendly.”  

Andrew Thompson, technical director of Ronald Britton, said: “There has been a number of cases of glitter manufacturers making dubious claims about the composition of their products and their biodegradability, essentially greenwashing the products they offer.  

“This is a major frustration for a business like ours, that has invested years in developing a green product. We welcome competition, however it’s not a level playing field if some companies are content to sell non-eco-friendly glitter to unsuspecting clients. 

“We’ve seen evidence of the same test report being used by several companies to claim biodegradability in the natural environment, however when scrutinised the test results show the glitter exhibits only modest breakdown under industrial composting conditions.

Complex

“This is nowhere near the test performance required to meet the claimed credentials of biodegradation in freshwater and natural environments.” 

Biodegradability is a key quality consumers and brands are looking for.  The potential pollution created by traditional glitter is in natural environments, therefore the essential requirement is a glitter that will actually biodegrade in natural environment- and not just in environments like composting.  

However, the environment is not the only factor. Time to biodegrade and how much biodegrades are also essential components in understanding biodegradability performance.  

Glitter sellers like Eco Glitter Fun have all said that it is the very nature of biodegradability being a complex subject that has led to it being open to abuse.  

Sophie Awdry said: “Being a complex subject there is a good deal of greenwashing occurring. There are a lot of companies claiming their glitter is biodegradable, but biodegradable is just a word and doesn’t actually mean anything, unless qualified in terms of how much, how long, and where.  

Independent

“If it takes 100 years to biodegrade, if just a small percentage biodegrades or if it needs special composting conditions, then it’s not eco-friendly in terms the natural environment.”

Glitter is made from several ingredients. The main ingredient is the core film, on which the colour, reflective and special effect coatings are applied. The resulting coated film is then cut into typically hexagons to make the finished glitter product.  

Thompson commented: “As the core film is the main ingredient in glitter it is often the focus of biodegradability claims, however, the coatings applied to it will influence its ability to biodegrade.  

“This is why biodegradability claims made on the basis of the core film alone don’t tell the whole story, and why independent testing of the actual finished glitter, coatings and all, is essential.” 

For consumers and brands looking to buy a truly eco-friendly product, the key is to look at the independent test data which reveals the level of biodegradability of glitter.

Decompose

Awdry added: “The way to not get greenwashed is do your research and look for evidence of actual test data on glitters by a recognised, independent testing organisation, such as freshwater testing by trusted independent companies like OWS, Belgium or even better third party test data verification and certification by companies like TÜV, Austria.

Inez Monteny, marketing and sales engineer at Belgian independent biodegradability tester OWS, said: “Products can be certified by independent labs, though many don’t bother.”

Kath Senior from EcoStardust, another one of the UK’s leading consumer eco-glitter brands, said: “Manufacturers who publicise their test data and report high levels of biodegradation, or even better have certification for freshwater biodegradability from independent third party organisations like TÜV Austria, one of the toughest and well regarded, are the glitters to opt for.”

Bioglitter replaces the use of plastics in the core of glitter with a plant-based product, MRC. This special form of cellulose, unique to Bioglitter, is stable and won’t degrade on the shelf, however once it enters soil, compost or water environments where microorganisms are present, the glitter will naturally decompose.

Branding

Ronald Britton has a vested interested in trying to tackle the issue of greenwashing in the industry and has launched their own scheme to ensure consumers know the sparkles they buy are actually environmentally friendly.

Stephen Cotton said: “We’ve been working with brands who sell glitter or glitter containing products, the likes of Eco Glitter Fun or EcoStardust and larger brands, as well as big retailers like Primark, T-Zone and Monsoon Accessorize to set up a scheme allowing authorised brands to use our protected Bioglitter logo.

“Most of the companies that now sell genuine ‘natural environment biodegradable’ glitter or use it in their products, display our Bioglitter logo either on the packaging itself or on their website. We also list all companies authorised to use our Bioglitter trade mark registered branding to prevent any ‘passing off’.”

Author

Paul Owen is a content and media specialist with more than 18 years’ experience writing articles for specialist sectors including manufacturing, technology, environment, FMCG and new product development.

Image: Ronald Britton. 

Age of extinction

The national newspaper The Guardian has launched an ambitious year-long project focusing on biodiversity and the variety of life on our planet.

The Age of Extinction will report on our current catastrophic species loss and examine solutions to tackle the wildlife extinction crisis.

The lead interactive story by award-winning foreign correspondent, Dan McDougall, takes readers to the remote research huts of Sermilik ice station in Greenland, where scientists are looking to the smallest of life forms to predict the pace of species extinction.

Environmental reporting

Other stories launched today include an opinion piece by the Guardian’s former environment editor, John Vidal, on the one million plant and animal species threatened with extinction and an in-depth explainer on why biodiversity matters to us.

Tracy McVeigh, editor of foundations and philanthropic projects, said: “It’s no exaggeration to say that most of what is familiar and dear to us in nature is under threat: our food, our water, our wellbeing and our landscape.

“We’ve pushed the natural world to its limits and its emergency is our emergency. One in four species are currently threatened with extinction.

“The Guardian has always been at the very forefront of environmental reporting and The Age of Extinction series is part of our journalistic response to the deepening crisis. With our network of correspondents, photographers and filmmakers around the world, we will showcase the solutions, as well as investigating the problems.”

The Age of Extinction is supported, in part, through grants to theguardian.org by the BAND Foundation, a private family organisation that oversees charitable interests through strategic grant-making, primarily in nature conservation and epilepsy care.

It has also received funding from the Wyss Foundation, which last year committed $1 billion to launch the Wyss Campaign for Nature to expand protected areas and help conserve 30 percent of the planet in a natural state by 2030.

This Article 

This article is based on a press release from Guardian News and Media. 

XR should disrupt ‘investors, asset managers, pension funds’

Former Irish president Mary Robinson has warned Extinction Rebellion protesters that they risk alienating the public if they do not employ smart tactics.

The UN Special Envoy on El Nino and Climate said disruption was necessary to affect change, but that it could take many forms.

She also praised the work of Greta Thunberg, saying her address at the UN’s Climate Action Summit last month brought her to tears.

Investors

Dr Robinson said: “I think what Greta and her generation are doing is humanising the issue of climate change in a very vivid way. Because what they’re saying – which is correct – is that we, the adults in the world, are not guaranteeing them a safe future; a liveable future.

“I was in the UN General Assembly during the Climate Action Summit, and when I heard her say ‘you have stolen my childhood’ – a 16-year-old – I cried, actually. I thought, ‘this is not fair’.”

Speaking to the PA news agency at the Aurora Forum in Yerevan, Armenia, Dr Robinson said climate change protests were one way of causing disruption, but that the most effective method was through investors, asset managers, and pension funds.

She added: “I see no significant move on the part of the emitters to change. So I now feel it’s time for disruption – and disruption takes many forms.

Clever

“Disruption can be litigation, disruption can be shareholder questions at meetings, disruption of a very effective thought can be when investors are warning about being invested in stranded assets.

“And disruption can be bottom up – the schoolchildren, the young people, the Extinction Rebellion, the women leaders. But the most effective is the investors. If they can really move that needle, it can move very fast.”

Asked about Extinction Rebellion protests in London last week which saw public transport targeted, Mrs Robinson said the activists need to keep people on side.

She explained: “I hope they will be very smart about their tactics, because if they alienate the public that will put us a step backwards. So far, on the whole, they have been quite clever they’ve been funny.

Peace

“They’ve been apologetic for the disruption caused because they don’t want to alienate the public. But then there are some who want to go further.

“I think it is very, very important that the public display of disruption is seen by the public as being in their interests, and that has happened. But if they lose that, that would be very serious.”

Dr Robinson became the first woman president of the Republic of Ireland in 1990. She is also a former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. In 2014, she was appointed to oversee UN efforts to tackle climate change.

Last November, she was appointed chairwoman of peace and human rights campaigning group The Elders.

This Author

Nina Massey is a reporter with PA. Yerevan, Armenia.

XR should disrupt ‘investors, asset managers, pension funds’

Former Irish president Mary Robinson has warned Extinction Rebellion protesters that they risk alienating the public if they do not employ smart tactics.

The UN Special Envoy on El Nino and Climate said disruption was necessary to affect change, but that it could take many forms.

She also praised the work of Greta Thunberg, saying her address at the UN’s Climate Action Summit last month brought her to tears.

Investors

Dr Robinson said: “I think what Greta and her generation are doing is humanising the issue of climate change in a very vivid way. Because what they’re saying – which is correct – is that we, the adults in the world, are not guaranteeing them a safe future; a liveable future.

“I was in the UN General Assembly during the Climate Action Summit, and when I heard her say ‘you have stolen my childhood’ – a 16-year-old – I cried, actually. I thought, ‘this is not fair’.”

Speaking to the PA news agency at the Aurora Forum in Yerevan, Armenia, Dr Robinson said climate change protests were one way of causing disruption, but that the most effective method was through investors, asset managers, and pension funds.

She added: “I see no significant move on the part of the emitters to change. So I now feel it’s time for disruption – and disruption takes many forms.

Clever

“Disruption can be litigation, disruption can be shareholder questions at meetings, disruption of a very effective thought can be when investors are warning about being invested in stranded assets.

“And disruption can be bottom up – the schoolchildren, the young people, the Extinction Rebellion, the women leaders. But the most effective is the investors. If they can really move that needle, it can move very fast.”

Asked about Extinction Rebellion protests in London last week which saw public transport targeted, Mrs Robinson said the activists need to keep people on side.

She explained: “I hope they will be very smart about their tactics, because if they alienate the public that will put us a step backwards. So far, on the whole, they have been quite clever they’ve been funny.

Peace

“They’ve been apologetic for the disruption caused because they don’t want to alienate the public. But then there are some who want to go further.

“I think it is very, very important that the public display of disruption is seen by the public as being in their interests, and that has happened. But if they lose that, that would be very serious.”

Dr Robinson became the first woman president of the Republic of Ireland in 1990. She is also a former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. In 2014, she was appointed to oversee UN efforts to tackle climate change.

Last November, she was appointed chairwoman of peace and human rights campaigning group The Elders.

This Author

Nina Massey is a reporter with PA. Yerevan, Armenia.

XR should disrupt ‘investors, asset managers, pension funds’

Former Irish president Mary Robinson has warned Extinction Rebellion protesters that they risk alienating the public if they do not employ smart tactics.

The UN Special Envoy on El Nino and Climate said disruption was necessary to affect change, but that it could take many forms.

She also praised the work of Greta Thunberg, saying her address at the UN’s Climate Action Summit last month brought her to tears.

Investors

Dr Robinson said: “I think what Greta and her generation are doing is humanising the issue of climate change in a very vivid way. Because what they’re saying – which is correct – is that we, the adults in the world, are not guaranteeing them a safe future; a liveable future.

“I was in the UN General Assembly during the Climate Action Summit, and when I heard her say ‘you have stolen my childhood’ – a 16-year-old – I cried, actually. I thought, ‘this is not fair’.”

Speaking to the PA news agency at the Aurora Forum in Yerevan, Armenia, Dr Robinson said climate change protests were one way of causing disruption, but that the most effective method was through investors, asset managers, and pension funds.

She added: “I see no significant move on the part of the emitters to change. So I now feel it’s time for disruption – and disruption takes many forms.

Clever

“Disruption can be litigation, disruption can be shareholder questions at meetings, disruption of a very effective thought can be when investors are warning about being invested in stranded assets.

“And disruption can be bottom up – the schoolchildren, the young people, the Extinction Rebellion, the women leaders. But the most effective is the investors. If they can really move that needle, it can move very fast.”

Asked about Extinction Rebellion protests in London last week which saw public transport targeted, Mrs Robinson said the activists need to keep people on side.

She explained: “I hope they will be very smart about their tactics, because if they alienate the public that will put us a step backwards. So far, on the whole, they have been quite clever they’ve been funny.

Peace

“They’ve been apologetic for the disruption caused because they don’t want to alienate the public. But then there are some who want to go further.

“I think it is very, very important that the public display of disruption is seen by the public as being in their interests, and that has happened. But if they lose that, that would be very serious.”

Dr Robinson became the first woman president of the Republic of Ireland in 1990. She is also a former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. In 2014, she was appointed to oversee UN efforts to tackle climate change.

Last November, she was appointed chairwoman of peace and human rights campaigning group The Elders.

This Author

Nina Massey is a reporter with PA. Yerevan, Armenia.

XR should disrupt ‘investors, asset managers, pension funds’

Former Irish president Mary Robinson has warned Extinction Rebellion protesters that they risk alienating the public if they do not employ smart tactics.

The UN Special Envoy on El Nino and Climate said disruption was necessary to affect change, but that it could take many forms.

She also praised the work of Greta Thunberg, saying her address at the UN’s Climate Action Summit last month brought her to tears.

Investors

Dr Robinson said: “I think what Greta and her generation are doing is humanising the issue of climate change in a very vivid way. Because what they’re saying – which is correct – is that we, the adults in the world, are not guaranteeing them a safe future; a liveable future.

“I was in the UN General Assembly during the Climate Action Summit, and when I heard her say ‘you have stolen my childhood’ – a 16-year-old – I cried, actually. I thought, ‘this is not fair’.”

Speaking to the PA news agency at the Aurora Forum in Yerevan, Armenia, Dr Robinson said climate change protests were one way of causing disruption, but that the most effective method was through investors, asset managers, and pension funds.

She added: “I see no significant move on the part of the emitters to change. So I now feel it’s time for disruption – and disruption takes many forms.

Clever

“Disruption can be litigation, disruption can be shareholder questions at meetings, disruption of a very effective thought can be when investors are warning about being invested in stranded assets.

“And disruption can be bottom up – the schoolchildren, the young people, the Extinction Rebellion, the women leaders. But the most effective is the investors. If they can really move that needle, it can move very fast.”

Asked about Extinction Rebellion protests in London last week which saw public transport targeted, Mrs Robinson said the activists need to keep people on side.

She explained: “I hope they will be very smart about their tactics, because if they alienate the public that will put us a step backwards. So far, on the whole, they have been quite clever they’ve been funny.

Peace

“They’ve been apologetic for the disruption caused because they don’t want to alienate the public. But then there are some who want to go further.

“I think it is very, very important that the public display of disruption is seen by the public as being in their interests, and that has happened. But if they lose that, that would be very serious.”

Dr Robinson became the first woman president of the Republic of Ireland in 1990. She is also a former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. In 2014, she was appointed to oversee UN efforts to tackle climate change.

Last November, she was appointed chairwoman of peace and human rights campaigning group The Elders.

This Author

Nina Massey is a reporter with PA. Yerevan, Armenia.

High air pollution is killing people

Spikes in air pollution trigger hundreds of heart attacks, strokes and acute asthma attacks in English cities compared to days when the air is cleaner, according to new research.

A study by King’s College London found there are significant short-term health risks caused by air pollution, as well as contributing to up to 36,000 deaths every year.

The study looked at data from nine English cities – London, Birmingham, Bristol, Derby, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham, Oxford and Southampton.

Strokes

It found on high pollution days – days when pollutant levels were in the top half of the annual range – there were an extra 124 cardiac arrests on average.

The figure discounts cardiac arrests suffered by patients already in hospital and is based on ambulance call data.

The research also found there was an average of 231 additional hospital admissions for stroke, with an extra 193 children and adults hospitalised for asthma.

Simon Stevens, chief executive of NHS England, described the numbers as “a health emergency”.

“As these new figures show, air pollution is now causing thousands of strokes, cardiac arrests and asthma attacks, so it’s clear that the climate emergency is in fact also a health emergency,” he said.

Attacks

“Since these avoidable deaths are happening now – not in 2025 or 2050 – together we need to act now.”

He added the NHS needed to radically reduce its own carbon footprint, as well as adapting its supply chain and transport to do its bit to cut pollutants.

The risk was found to be greatest in London, where high pollution days cause an extra 87 cardiac arrests on average, an extra 144 strokes as well as 74 children and 33 adults hospitalised for asthma.

Birmingham saw the second highest risk, with 12 more out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 27 more admissions for stroke, with 15 extra children and 11 adults hospitalised for asthma.

Bristol, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham, Oxford and Southampton saw between two and six additional out-of-hospital heart attacks on high pollution days.

Clear

These cities saw an uptick of between two and 14 extra hospitalisations for stroke, and up to 14 extra admissions for asthma. Only Derby did not see an increase in heart attacks on high pollution days.

Among the long-term risks associated with high pollution levels are stunted lung growth and low birth weight.

The research also found cutting air pollution by a fifth would decrease incidents of lung cancer by between 5% and 7% across the nine cities surveyed.

Dr Heather Walton, health expert on the project at Environmental Research Group, King’s College London, said: “The impact of air pollution on our health has been crucial in justifying air pollution reduction policies for some time, and mostly concentrates on effects connected to life-expectancy.

“However, health studies show clear links with a much wider range of health effects.”

Guidelines

The figures were published ahead of the International Clean Air Summit this Wednesday hosted by Mayor of London Sadiq Khan and the UK100 this week.

The UK100 is a network of local government leaders, who have pledged to help their communities shift to 100% clean energy by 2050.

Polly Billington, director of UK100, said: “Local government needs additional powers and resources to address this public health crisis, alongside a timetable for when air pollution levels will meet World Health Organisation guidelines.”

Andrea Lee, clean air campaigns and policy manager at ClientEarth, said: “King’s new research is a stark reminder of the impacts that air pollution has on people’s health across the country.

Transport

“Our air is filthy and clean air zones are the most effective way to clean it up in the shortest possible time. This is backed up by newest data from London that show that the Ultra Low Emission Zone reduced nitrogen dioxide pollution by 29 percent during a three-month period, compared to a scenario where no ULEZ was in place.

“These results are very encouraging and prove that we don’t have to accept dirty air solely because we live in towns and cities.

“National and local government have to work together to urgently create a national network of clean air zones, like the Ultra Low Emission Zone in London, with help and support for people and businesses to move on to cleaner forms of transport.”

The full report is due to be published in November.

This Author

Tess de la Mare is a reporter with PA.

Climate fears shifting investment to ethical funds

Climate concerns could prompt more investors to move their money to ethical funds which support the positive changes they want to see, a survey suggests.

A total of 45 percent of investors say they would move their money to an ethical fund as a result of news about the environment, Triodos Bank found.

Among those aged 18 to 24, more than three-quarters (78 percent) would be prompted to move their money to “impact investments” – which have a positive effect on society and the environment.

Investing

On average, investors would put £3,744 in an impact investment fund, an increase of £1,000 compared with 2018.

More than half of those surveyed believe choosing carefully where you invest your money is one of the best ways to help the planet, rising to 76 percent among investors aged 18 to 24.

Three-quarters of those surveyed agreed that financial providers need to be more transparent about where people’s money goes. The ethical bank’s survey of more than 2,000 people across the UK was carried out in early October.

Concerns about the climate have been highlighted by groups such as Extinction Rebellion, various celebrities such as Sir Mark Rylance, Dame Emma Thompson and Benedict Cumberbatch, student protesters and teenage activist Greta Thunberg.

Triodos Bank’s latest annual impact investing survey found that awareness of impact investing is higher than in any year since the survey was started in 2016.

Positive

More than half of investors still said that they had not heard of impact funds, although this is down from 67 percent in 2018. Nearly two-thirds had never been offered impact or sustainable investment opportunities, down from 73 percent last year.

Two-thirds of investors would like their investments to support companies that contribute to making a more positive society and environment, up from 55 percent last year.

Gareth Griffiths, head of retail banking, Triodos Bank UK, said: “Many investors are no longer waiting for governments to take the lead in our transition to a fairer, greener society – they are using their own money to back the change they want to see.

“We are seeing a shift from those simply screening out negative investments to instead looking for direct positive impacts.”

This Author

Vicky Shaw is the the personal finance correspondent for PA.  

How not to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies

Across Europe, and many other places, people are laying their bodies down, facing arrest, calling for government action on environmental policies, including cutting fossil fuel subsidies. In Ecuador, people are putting their lives at risk to reinstate them.  

The protests were successful. After eleven days of unrest, seven dead, hundreds arrested and thousands injured, the government met with protesters for peace talks, and negotiated the reinstatement of fossil fuel subsidies in Ecuador.  

On Monday 14 October, people cleared concrete debris and stones from makeshift road blockades and swept the black ash that lined the streets from protest fires. Transport services resumed, and schools, shops and offices reopened. The nation returning to peace. 

Price rise

What went wrong in Ecuador? 

The third of October is the first day the effect of eliminating government fuel subsidies shattered Ecuador’s population: fuel prices rose by 25-75 percent overnight. 

The protests began with a transport strike, as the immediate rise in gasoline and diesel prices forced bus operators and taxis to hike up fares. With only a handful of tourist trains in the country, the primary form of transport in Ecuador is public bus. 

Quito is gaining a metro, but construction is delayed; it will not open till next summer at the earliest. Until it opens, grime covered red and blue buses spew trails of toxic black clouds, zooming through the valleys of Quito – home for more than two million people.  

For the vast majority of Ecuadorians, these buses are the only way to navigate the cities looping, dangerous tunnels and overhead highways. A single fair on one of these (often) overcrowded, questionably driven buses – that would never meet European safety standards – is 25 US cents. 

The subsidy cut resulted in fares as high as 40 US cents for a single journey. Overnight millions of people could not get to work or school, the price of goods and food rose with it, as the cost of freight spiked.  

Unstable economy

Johana Sánchez, Ecuadorian cultural sociologist and journalist, explained: “The subsidy goes beyond gasoline and diesel. It affects all the freight vehicles loaded with products for transportation.”

The price of an unstable fossil fuel reliant economy, as well as the weight of the clouds of polluting fumes, was in one policy, laid on the shoulders of the poorest people in Ecuador.  

Many people have, “to take five buses a day” to get to work in Quito, explains Maggie Criollo, an activist for Solidarios Chiriquí, a local group that provides emergency food, water and medicine for indigenous people that have travelled to Quito to protest.  

The price hikes, coupled with Ecuador’s low wages, meant people could not cope with the price increases. 

The minimum wage in Ecuador is US$300 to $400 a month. According to the World Bank, nearly a quarter of Ecuador’s population live under the poverty line.  

Anger

Criollo claims that most people are on a basic wage of $300 dollars. She, a single mother with two young children, is living on just $200 dollars a month. Criollo said:  “It does not meet our needs, but there are people who have much less.

“People who are not so worried, it is because the price hikes will not affect them. The president just says we should work harder.

“People are angry because of the economic measures that [president] Lenin Moreno’s nefarious government is applying. We have to respond in some way.”

People responded in their thousands by taking to the streets. Roads were blockaded, airports closed, shops and schools shut their gates. The entire nation came to a sudden halt.  

It started with transport workers, then students and young people, explains Criollo, then the strike “intensified” as indigenous communities travelled from as far as the Amazon region to join protests in city streets.

Criollo added: “There are some Cotopaxi [a province neighbouring Quito] mothers who say that it is very sweet to die for their children. People get up and protest because they have nothing to lose.”

Nationwide protests

After five days of nationwide protests, where protesters clashed with riot police and the military in the worst civil unrest seen in Ecuador for over a decade, Ecuador’s government fled to the coastal city of Guayaquil, declaring a two-month state of emergency.  

Seven people lost their lives in the unrest. Criollo says that one young man was hospitalised after being wounded in an altercation with the police, and later died, while in Cayambe (north of Quito) two middle aged people died from rubber bullet wounds. 

Criollo said: “They [the government] are violating our human rights and they are killing us.”

Subsidy cuts in service to austerity, not the environment 

Fossil fuel subsidy cuts are supposed to save the environment, signaling an end to fossil fuel dominance, and the beginning of heavy investment in alternatives, while also saving tax payers money. 

However, in Ecuador, the subsidy cut is just one of many austerity obligations that are part of a US$4.2 billion arrangement with the International Monetary Fund. President Lenin Moreno – who won by popular vote in April, 2017 – told reporters last week that Ecuador´s fuel subsidies, which have been in place for decades, “distort” Ecuador’s economy and were being eliminated. 

Petrostate

A third of the country’s export earnings came from petroleum resources in 2017: the nation is dependent on fossil fuels, fossil fuel exports, or international loans to exploit more fossil fuels.  

Sánchez said that Ecuador has “always depended on external funds. Venezuela and Ecuador have refineries that other countries would like to manage. Latin America’s economies are based on oil extraction.”

For years, Ecuador’s neighbour (on the other side of Colombia), Venezuela has been in crisis.  

According to OPEC, Venezuela’s oil revenues account for 99 percent of export earnings – the nation is often referred to as a ‘petrostate’. With the largest oil reserves in the world, economic instability was spurred after oil prices began to fall in 2014. This economic dependence on fossil fuels, alongside political mismanagement and corruption, led to the humanitarian crisis in Venezuela.  

Millions of Venezuelan´s fled their home country, with over 100,000 Venezuelans seeking refuge in Ecuador last year. 

Fossil fuel-dependency

Last month, Argentina implemented currency controls, as it is also in the midst of a fossil fuel-dependency caused financial crisis.  

Tom Sanzillo is director of finance at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Affairs (IEEFA), which has just released a report that investigates Argentina´s energy mix and economy. Sanzillo said: “Global oil and gas prices are low, global markets weak, foreign partners stepping back, production costs high, Argentina’ s economy and politics unstable.”

But there are alternatives. The IEEFA’s report lays out a roadmap to reduce dependency on fossil fuel exports and international funds to increase economic and political stability.  

The report states: “An energy plan that promotes renewable energy and prudent use of oil and gas assets will reduce inflationary pressures in the energy sector. Once built, renewable energy has no fuel cost. And renewable costs are expected to continue to fall due to economies of scale and accelerating technology gains.” 

Today, 43 percent of Ecuador’s electricity comes from fossil fuels, 54 percent from hydro and 2 percent from other renewables.  

Renewable energy

Ecuador’s 2015 INDC Paris climate agreement, stated that the country aimed to generate 90 percent of its energy from hydropower by 2017, and to increase its use of renewables by 2025. 

While some of this hydropower generation is in development, along with a 16.5MW wind farm in Villonaco, and solar energy projects in the Galapagos Islands, and Feed-in-Tarrif mechanisms for renewables, the country is far behind its renewable energy generation targets.  

There are also projects underway to electrify buses in Quito and the southern city of Cuenca – which, if supplied with renewable electricity, would eliminate much of the current anger over rising bus fares, as gasoline and diesel would not be needed.  

Protesters in Ecuador care about the environment, says Sánchez: “There is a subversive fight for the environment, but the media are complicit in not reporting what is happening.” 

Indigenous families, groups and activists leading the protests are also national champions for environmental reforms. Sánchez said: “Indigenous people go to the head of the protest and are also against the exploitation of the land.”

Peace negotiations

However, at the moment, peoples demands for a safe, stable economy and environment are not being listened to.

Lucrecia Maldonado is a Spanish professor living in Quito and strongly supports the previous populist regime. Maldonado said: “A national reconciliation is not possible, because of inequality, the classes are irreconcilable.

“No one is willing to give in. I feel sad for my country, but at least people are fighting and not leaving. They are putting their bodies in the way of bullets, without being submissive.”

On the 11 and 12 October, open letters on social media from indigenous activist group, CONAIE (the national confederation of indigenous people in Ecuador), stated it believes there are alternatives to the current IMF subsidy fuel cut agreement, and that negotiations to end the protests can only occur in public – not behind closed doors – and only with guarantees of the safety of indigenous representatives, with mediation from the United Nations.  

On 13 October, peace negotiations finally began in Quito, live on television and social media, with the president, a United Nations mediator and representatives from across Ecuador. The talks began with the president standing firm on keeping on the subsidy cut, while Jaime Vargas, president of CONIAE, and other local and indigenous leaders called for the subsidy cut (decree 883) to be cancelled, and agreed to end the protests. 

Oppression

After several hours, the government agreed to retract the subsidy cut, known as decree 883, ending the subsidy cut.  

The need for violent protest to reach the agreement, “breaks my heart,” says Sánchez. 

“I don’t want any more bloodshed,” says Criollo, “but we are tired, and we cannot allow this oppression to continue.” 

Ecuador will not “kneel” to the whims of fossil fuel caused instability, says Sánchez. 

This Author

Lucy EJ Woods is a freelance journalist specialising in on-the-ground environmental reporting. She is currently reporting from South America and lives in Quito.

Image: Twitter, @pecesglobal.